Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31708453›Full record

Trial reportClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2020

Priorities for Rural Lymphoma Survivors: A Qualitative Study.

Lillian Chen, Jackelyn B Payne, Kaylin V Dance, Conner B Imbody, Cathy D Ho, Amy A Ayers, Christopher R Flowers

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lillian ChenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Jackelyn B PayneDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
Kaylin V DanceDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Conner B ImbodyDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Cathy D HoDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Amy A AyersDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Christopher R FlowersDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: crflowe@emory.edu.

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
The Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Cohort Study (Supplement)U01CA195568 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CERHAN, JAMES R, FLOWERS, CHRISTOPHER R · 2015 to 2025
$22.1M
Mentored Patient Oriented Research in LymphomaK24CA208132 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI FLOWERS, CHRISTOPHER R · 2016 to 2020
$822k
NCI NIH HHS K24 CA208132NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe gathered rural patient perspectives on lymphoma care and unmet needs throughout the treatment course to better understand their attitudes toward treatment and their barriers to participating in clinical research studies. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted 12 individual semi-structured telephone interviews in the spring of 2018 with lymphoma survivors from rural counties in Georgia. Patients were identified by a residential address in counties classified as rural according to the Rural-Urban Commuting Areas codes. Participants were recruited from regional patient education conferences and from current research participants at a university research hospital in Georgia. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis and MAXQDA, version 18.0.8, were used to facilitate a constant comparative coding process during theme development.

resultsThe greatest barrier to care was the travel distance. The participants described difficulty navigating between local clinics and larger cancer centers. The lack of communication between the local and specialized clinics complicated the process, and participants had difficulty contacting or seeking advice from the team at the larger cancer centers. Seeking treatment from specialized clinics farther away introduced additional barriers. Most participants agreed that the use of technology was important for improved communication. Participants described lymphoma etiology, subtype-specific studies, alternative therapies, and quality of life as key research priorities.

conclusionThese findings suggest that targeted research and interventions are necessary to address the specific needs of rural patients with and survivors of lymphoma. To address the disparity in health outcomes within rural populations, healthcare professionals and investigators can use these data to engage rural patients in treatment decision-making and research planning.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLymphomaMaleQualitative ResearchRural PopulationSurvivorsDisparityLymphomaQualitativeRuralSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID31708453
PMCPMC7006835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.