Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31708150›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2019

Estimating malaria burden among pregnant women using data from antenatal care centres in Tanzania: a population-based study.

Chonge Kitojo, Julie R Gutman, Frank Chacky, Emmanuel Kigadye, Sigsbert Mkude, Renata Mandike, Ally Mohamed, Erik J Reaves, Patrick Walker, Deus S Ishengoma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of Pregnancy Associated Malaria in India.Frontiers in global women's health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sampling for malaria molecular surveillance.Trends in parasitology · 2023
    Review
  14. Assessing the utility of pregnant women as a sentinel surveillance population for malaria in Geita, Tanzania, 2019 - 2021.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Chonge KitojoUS President's Malaria Initiative, USAID, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania; Open University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Electronic address: ckitojo@usaid.gov.
Julie R GutmanMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Frank ChackyNational Malaria Control Programme, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Emmanuel KigadyeOpen University of Tanzania, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Sigsbert MkudeNational Malaria Control Programme, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Renata MandikeNational Malaria Control Programme, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Ally MohamedNational Malaria Control Programme, Dodoma, Tanzania.
Erik J ReavesMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and US President's Malaria Initiative, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Patrick WalkerMRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Deus S IshengomaNational Institute for Medical Research, Tanga Research Centre, Tanga, Tanzania.
African Malaria Network Trust · TZOpen University of Tanzania · TZCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USLondon Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research · GBNational Institute for Medical Research · TZ

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore timely estimates of malaria prevalence are needed to inform optimal control strategies and measure progress. Since 2014, Tanzania has implemented nationwide malaria screening for all pregnant women within the antenatal care system. We aimed to compare malaria test results during antenatal care to two population-based prevalence surveys in Tanzanian children aged 6-59 months to examine their potential in measuring malaria trends and progress towards elimination.

methodsMalaria test results from pregnant women screened at their first antenatal care visits at health-care facilities (private and public) in all 184 districts of Tanzania between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2017, were collected from the Health Management Information Systems and District Health Information System 2. We excluded facilities with no recorded antenatal care attendees during the time period. We standardised results to account for testing uptake and weighted them by the timing of two population-based surveys of childhood malaria prevalence done in 2015-16 (Demographic and Health Survey) and 2017 (Malaria Indicator Survey). We assessed regional-level correlation using Spearman's coefficient and assessed the consistency of monthly district-level prevalence ranking using Kendall's correlation coefficient.

findingsCorrelation between malaria prevalence at antenatal care and among children younger than 5 years was high (r≥0·83 for both surveys), although declines in prevalence at antenatal care were generally smaller than among children. Consistent heterogeneity (p<0·05) in antenatal care prevalence at the district level was evident in all but one region (Kilimanjaro). Data from antenatal care showed declining prevalence in three regions (Arusha, Kilimanjaro, and Manyara) where surveys estimated zero prevalence.

interpretationRoutine antenatal care-based screening can be used to assess heterogeneity in transmission at finer resolution than population-based surveys, and provides sample sizes powered to detect changes, notably in areas of low transmission where surveys lack power. Declines in prevalence at antenatal care might lag behind those among children, highlighting the value of monitoring burden and continuing prevention efforts among pregnant women as transmission declines. The pregnancy-specific benefits and cost-effectiveness of antenatal care-based screening remain to be assessed.

fundingNone.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth FacilitiesHumansMalariaMass ScreeningPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPrenatal CarePrevalenceTanzaniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31708150
PMCPMC8752309
OpenAlexW2988486427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.