Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707938›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology review2020

Health behaviour change in cardiovascular disease prevention and management: meta-review of behaviour change techniques to affect self-regulation.

Jerry Suls, Jazmin N Mogavero, Louise Falzon, Linda S Pescatello, Emily A Hennessy, Karina W Davidson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology review, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jerry SulsCenter for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8436-7488
Jazmin N MogaveroCenter for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7921-0606
Louise FalzonCenter for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9449-6056
Linda S PescatelloDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Emily A HennessyThe Sharp Research Lab, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5146-5823
Karina W DavidsonCenter for Personalized Health, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9162-477X

Funding

Columbia University Science of Behavior Change Resource and Coordinating Center renewal -Ontology Administrative SupplementU24AG052175 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI EDMONDSON, DONALD · 2015 to 2024
$14.5M
NIA NIH HHS U24 AG052175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-regulation processes assume a major role in health behaviour theory and are postulated as important mechanisms of action in behavioural interventions to improve health prevention and management. The need to better understand mechanisms of behaviour change interventions for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) called for conducting a meta-review of meta-analyses for interventions targeting self-regulation processes. The protocol, preregistered on Open Science Framework (OSF), found 15 eligible meta-analyses, published between 2006 and August 2019, which quantitatively assessed the role of self-regulatory mechanisms and behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Quality of the meta-analyses varied widely according to AMSTAR-2 criteria. Several BCTs, assumed to engage self-regulatory mechanisms, were unevenly represented in CVD meta-analytic reviews. Self-monitoring, the most frequently studied self-regulatory BCT, seemed to improve health behaviour change and health outcomes but these results merit cautious interpretation. Findings for other self-regulatory BCTs were less promising. No studies in the CVD domain directly tested engagement of self-regulation processes. A general challenge for this area stems from reliance on post-hoc tests of the effects of BCTs in multiple-component interventions. Recent advances in BCT taxonomies and the experimental medicine approach to engaging self-regulation mechanisms, however, provide opportunities to improve CVD prevention and management behavioural interventions.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyHealth BehaviorMeta-Analysis as TopicSelf-ControlSystematic Reviews as TopicCardiovascular DiseasesDisease ManagementHumansIntentionbehaviour change techniquescardiovascular diseaseinterventionMeta-reviewpreventionself-regulation

Identifiers

PMID31707938
PMCPMC7018570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.