Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707767›Full record

Trial reportThoracic cancer2020

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic marker in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial.

Gyeong-Won Lee, Se-Il Go, Dong-Wan Kim, Hoon-Gu Kim, Joo-Hang Kim, Ho Jung An, Joung Soon Jang, Bong-Seog Kim, Seokyung Hahn, Dae Seog Heo

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. GNRI And Conut Scores: Simple Predictors of Sarcopenia in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Gyeong-Won LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
Se-Il GoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
Dong-Wan KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5124-7132
Hoon-Gu KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.
Joo-Hang KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.
Ho Jung AnDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Joung Soon JangDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Bong-Seog KimDivision of Hemato-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Seokyung HahnMedical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dae Seog HeoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Changwon National University · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRCHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRChung-Ang University · KRGyeongsang National University Hospital · KRSeoul National University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KRVeterans Health Service Medical Center · KR

Funding

Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea A040151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical impact of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in patients with extensive-stage disease small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) have not previously been reported.

methodsThis study analyzed 352 patients enrolled in a previous randomized phase III trial comparing the efficacy of irinotecan plus cisplatin with that of etoposide plus cisplatin as the first-line therapy for ED-SCLC. GNRI values were calculated using serum albumin levels and actual and ideal bodyweights. Patients with a GNRI > 98, 92-98, and <92 were grouped into no, low, and moderate/major risk groups, respectively.

resultsThe objective response rates were 63.2%, 52.6%, and 49.2% in the no, low, and moderate/major risk groups, respectively (P = 0.024). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was shorter in patients with a lower GNRI than in those with a higher GNRI (no vs. low vs. moderate/major risk group; 6.5 vs. 5.8 vs. 5.9 months, respectively; P = 0.028). There were significant differences in median overall survival (OS) according to GNRI (no vs. low vs. moderate/major risk group; 13.2 vs. 10.3 vs. 8.4 months, respectively; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that being in the moderate/major risk group was an independent poor prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.300, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.012-1.670; P = 0.040) and OS (HR: 1.539; 95% CI: 1.069-2.216; P = 0.020).

conclusionsThis prospective study shows that a low GNRI value was associated with a poor prognosis, and it supports the relationship between systemic inflammation, nutritional status, and clinical outcomes in patients with ED-SCLC.Key points SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: The lower GNRI group had a low response rate to chemotherapy for ED-SCLC. The HRs for PFS and OS were 1.300 and 1.539 in the patients with GNRI < 92. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: Low GNRI is associated with poor prognosis in ED-SCLC.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGeriatric AssessmentHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaSurvival RateCachexiainflammationnutrition assessmentsmall cell lung carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31707767
PMCPMC6938749
OpenAlexW2987909617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.