ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2020
Initiation of a fixed-dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate protocol.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety and efficacy of fixed versus variable-dose prothrombin complex concentrate for emergent reversal of vitamin K antagonists: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of modified fixed dose four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for warfarin reversal.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2024Article
- Review
- Initiation of a fixed- dose four- factor prothrombin complex concentrate protocol.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Article
- Use and effectiveness of a two-level initiation strategy for fixed-dose prothrombin complex concentrate according to the initial international normalized ratio in an emergency department in Japan.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients who require urgent warfarin reversal often receive four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC), which is traditionally dosed according to weight and initial INR. Our institution implemented a fixed-dose 4F-PCC strategy, using an initial dose of 1500 units. We evaluated the frequency with which the initial fixed dose 4F-PCC was inadequate, as defined by need for supplemental dosing. As part of the protocol, if the initial fixed-dose 4F-PCC is administered and does not achieve INR goal, then the remainder of the standard weight- and INR-based dosing can be given. During the study period, 63 patients on warfarin received 4F-PCC using the fixed-dose protocol. Based on the INR following 4F-PCC administration, 11 patients (17%) were eligible to receive a supplemental dose based on failure to achieve their specified INR goal. Two of the 11 patients eligible for supplemental 4F-PCC dosing received the second dose, both with initial supratherapeutic INRs > 3.5. We found that most patients given an initial fixed-dose 4F-PCC achieved their INR goals, and of those who did not, most did not receive supplemental dosing, suggesting that clinical providers felt that adequate hemostasis had been achieved. In addition, fixed-dose 4F-PCC was able to be given rapidly, with few dosing errors, suggesting that this is a reasonable option for 4F-PCC delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31707622What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.