ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2020
Insufficient accommodation during binocular near viewing in eyes with intermittent exotropia.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Esotropia and Exotropia Preferred Practice Pattern®.Ophthalmology · 2023Guideline
- Association between crystalline lens thickness and intermittent exotropia in children: a cross-sectional observational clinical study.European journal of medical research · 2025Observational
- Accommodative responses under various viewing conditions in surgical patients with intermittent exotropia: an institutional, retrospective study.BMC ophthalmology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the changes in spherical equivalent and pupil response during near viewing in patients with intermittent exotropia (IXT) who have complaints of blurred vision or asthenopia from near viewing in daily life using a novel binocular wavefront aberrometer. STUDY
designA cross-sectional study.
methodsTen IXT patients and ten healthy subjects wearing full-correction lenses at far sight (5 m) were instructed to fixate on a near target at 67 cm, which was then moved to 40 cm three times. Serial changes in the spherical equivalent (SE) refractive error (SE) were measured during this task using a laboratory-made open-field binocular Hartmann-Shack wavefront aberrometer and compared between patients and healthy subjects. In the IXT patients, regression analysis was performed between ∆SE and exodeviation angles, as measured by an alternate prism and cover test. Pupil-diameter and pupil-constriction ratios were also compared between patients and healthy subjects, and the correlation of constriction ratio with ∆SE was calculated for both groups.
resultsCompared to healthy subjects, IXT patients demonstrated significantly lower ∆SE of convergence (mean ± SD, 0.91 ± 0.26 D vs. 1.15 ± 0.19 D; P < 0.05) and divergence (0.93 ± 0.28 D vs. 1.16 ± 0.20 D; P < 0.05). Angle of exotropia was negatively correlated with ∆SE during far-sight and near-sight convergence and divergence (P < 0.05). Pupil-constriction ratio was also reduced in patients compared to healthy subjects (6.67% ± 3.31% vs. 11.9% ± 5.96%; P<0.05). Pupil-constriction ratio was positively correlated with ∆SE during convergence in both groups (P < 0.05).
conclusionInsufficient accommodation and pupil constriction during near viewing were observed in patients with IXT who had complaints of blurred vision or asthenopia from near viewing. These conditions might contribute to symptoms, such as fatigue, eye strain and impaired visual performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.