Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707602›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2019

Does the medical autopsy still have a place in the current diagnostic process? A 6-year retrospective study in two French University hospitals.

Sarah Humez, Clémence Delteil, Claude Alain Maurage, Julia Torrents, Caroline Capuani, Lucile Tuchtan, Marie-Dominique Piercecchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah HumezDepartment of Pathology, Lille University Hospital, 2 avenue Oscar Lambret, 59000, Lille, France.
Clémence DelteilForensic Department, La Timone University Hospital, 264 rue St Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France. clemence.delteil@ap-hm.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5171-8520
Claude Alain MaurageDepartment of Pathology, Lille University Hospital, 2 avenue Oscar Lambret, 59000, Lille, France.
Julia TorrentsForensic Department, La Timone University Hospital, 264 rue St Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Caroline CapuaniForensic Department, La Timone University Hospital, 264 rue St Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Lucile TuchtanForensic Department, La Timone University Hospital, 264 rue St Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Marie-Dominique PiercecchiForensic Department, La Timone University Hospital, 264 rue St Pierre, 13385, Marseille Cedex 05, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Oscar Lambret · FRHôpital de la Timone · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical autopsies have been in considerable decline for several decades, in France and worldwide. We aimed to determine whether a medical autopsy still currently has a role to play in diagnosis, by analyzing its performance and diagnostic limitations. This dual-centre retrospective descriptive study included all medical autopsies performed in the university hospitals of Lille and Marseille, France, between January 2007 and December 2012. Autopsies of fetuses or stillborn infants, or those related to sudden infant deaths and research protocols were excluded. 412 medical autopsies were included. The male:female ratio was 1.5:1 and mean age was 27.3 years. Half of all autopsies were pediatric. Regarding anatomical region and/or injury mechanism, a clinical diagnosis was suggested in 52.2% of cases, an autopsy diagnosis in 55.6% and a microscopic diagnosis in 81.8%. There was very low agreement between the clinician's suggested diagnosis and the final diagnosis, both for organ specific diseases and cause of death. Agreement was moderate between autopsy diagnoses and microscopic diagnoses for organ specific diseases and low for cause of death. From our findings we concluded that an autopsy associated with microscopic examination was still valuable in diagnosing cause of death. Microscopic examination was indispensable to determine certain causes of death.

Indexed as

Cause of deathDiagnostic procedureMedical autopsyPathology

Identifiers

PMID31707602
OpenAlexW2987406047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.