Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707571›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

Management of leak after sleeve gastrectomy: outcomes of 73 cases, treatment algorithm and predictors of resolution.

Moataz Bashah, Nesreen Khidir, Moamena El-Matbouly

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Plain X-ray findings of post sleeve gastrectomy gastric leak.Journal of clinical imaging science · 2022
    Article
  17. THE ROUTINE USE OF THE METHYLENE BLUE TEST IN SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: WHY NOT?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moataz BashahDepartment of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar.
Nesreen KhidirDepartment of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar. Dr_sora4@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3574-0423
Moamena El-MatboulyDepartment of General Surgery, Hamad General Hospital, Doha, Qatar.
Hamad General Hospital · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGastric leak post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that has been reported in 1.5-3% of cases. Management algorithms of leak exist; however, no known factors predict the time to resolution. This study aims to share outcomes of our management algorithm of post LSG leak, including the rate of resolution, complications, admission to the intensive care unit, conversion to other techniques, and mortality. To determine if any factors can predict the resolution time.

methodsA retrospective analysis of patients who had LSG leaks and was managed in the main tertiary center in Qatar (January 2012-December 2017).

resultsA total of seventy-three patients had post LSG leaks. Fifty-six (76.7%) underwent LSG outside our center. Thirteen leaks (17.8%) were after revisional LSG. Laparoscopic exploration was performed in twenty patients (27.4%) and feeding jejunostomy in nine patients (12.3%). Patients were followed up for 12 months. All healed within 8.8 ± 0.72 weeks. The resolution rate was (97.1%) without surgical conversion, while two patients required fistulo-jejunostomy. No patient died. Complications occurred; re-leak (14.9%) and splenic abscess (2.9%). Patients on jejunal feeding had shorter resolution time (HR = 2.7, P = 0.018), while patients on total parenteral nutrition and post-endoscopic dilatation had 66% and 50% increases in the resolution time; (HR = 0.34, P = 0.026) and (HR = 0.5, P = 0.047), respectively.

conclusionManagement of post-LSG leak is multimodal. Our clinical experience demonstrated less urge to perform extensive surgical interventions. Patients on enteral feeding had shorter resolution time while patients with sleeve stricture had a longer time to resolution.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultAnastomotic LeakEnteral NutritionFemaleGastrectomyHumansJejunostomyLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPrognosisQatarRetrospective StudiesStomachManagement of leak post sleeve gastrectomyPost LSG leak complicationsPredictors of resolution time

Identifiers

PMID31707571
OpenAlexW2983957496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.