Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707557›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2019

Journey for patients following ileostomy creation is not straightforward.

Dedrick Kok Hong Chan, Jingyu Ng, Frederick Hong-Xiang Koh, Tianzhi Lim, Danson Yeo, Kok-Yang Tan, Ker-Kan Tan

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Impact of ileostomy in the adjuvant treatment and outcome of colon cancer.International journal of colorectal disease · 2023
    Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dedrick Kok Hong ChanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4237-8648
Jingyu NgDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, Singapore.
Frederick Hong-Xiang KohDivision of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Tianzhi LimDivision of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
Danson YeoDepartment of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, Singapore.
Kok-Yang TanDepartment of Surgery, Khoo Teck Puat Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Rd, Singapore, Singapore.
Ker-Kan TanDivision of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore. ker_kan_tan@nuhs.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn ileostomy is usually created to avert systemic sepsis in a patient with a tenuous anastomosis. However, what is often not reported are the numerous issues facing these patients subsequently, ranging from readmissions, non-reversal of the stoma, and complications from the closure. This study was performed to identify these issues among patients following creation of an ileostomy.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who had an ileostomy created from January 2011 to December 2016 at two institutions. Statistical analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with readmissions and ileostomy non-reversal.

resultsIn total, 193 patients had an ileostomy created during the study period. Twenty-six (13.5%) patients developed stoma-related complications requiring readmission. The most common cause of readmission (9.3%) was due to dehydration and acute kidney injury secondary to high stoma output. One hundred thirty (67.4%) patients had their ileostomy reversed. On multivariate analysis, only stomas created during an ultra-low anterior resection were associated with reversal (OR 2.88 [95% CI, 1.24-6.68]; p = 0.014). Among the patients who underwent ileostomy reversal, seven (3.6%) patients developed complications from their ileostomy reversal. Four patients (2.1%) suffered from an anastomotic leak which required repeat surgical intervention with one mortality from the ensuing sepsis.

conclusionAlmost half of the patients who had an Ileostomy had an undesirable outcome, including readmissions, non-reversal, and post-operative complications following closure. Patients need to be properly counselled about the risks involved prior to the index operation.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIleostomyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSingaporeTime FactorsComplicationsIleostomyReversal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.