ReviewNeuroradiology2020
Venous pathologies in paediatric neuroradiology: from foetal to adolescent life.
Review in Neuroradiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endovascular stenting of bilateral hypoplastic jugular bulb in a toddler with elevated intracranial pressure: a case report.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Paediatric cranial ultrasound: abnormalities of the brain in term neonates and young infants.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
- Advancements in MRI application in the morphological development of fetal cerebral venous system: a review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Article
- Tumour mimics in paediatric neuroimaging.Neuroradiology · 2025Review
- Fetal torcular pseudomass and development of the dural venous sinuses: insights from 2D TOF MR angiography.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Cerebral venous thrombosis and deep medullary vein thrombosis: Padua experience over the last two decades.European journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Fetal brain MR angiography at 1.5 T: a feasible study.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- A radiomics-based study of deep medullary veins in infants: Evaluation of neonatal brain injury with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathyFrontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Fetal dural sinus malformation: A case report and discussion of the literature.Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine · 2021Article
- Deep medullary vein engorgement and superficial medullary vein engorgement: two patterns of perinatal venous stroke.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Neonatal Developmental Venous Anomalies: Clinicoradiologic Characterization and Follow-Up.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interpretation of cerebral venous pathologies in paediatric practice is challenging as there are several normal anatomical variants, and the pathologies are diverse, involving the venous system through direct and indirect mechanisms. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of these entities, as their awareness can avoid potential diagnostic pitfalls. We also propose a practical classification system of paediatric cerebral venous pathologies, which will enable more accurate reporting of the neuroimaging findings, as relevant to the underlying pathogenesis of these conditions. The proposed classification system comprises of the following main groups: arterio-venous shunting-related disorders, primary venous malformations and veno-occlusive disorders. A multimodal imaging approach has been included in the relevant subsections, with a brief overview of the modality-specific pitfalls that can also limit interpretation of the neuroimaging. The article also summarises the current literature and international practices in terms of management options and outcomes in specific disease entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31707531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.