Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707508›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2020

Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hematological Patients at the intensive care unit: a global cross-sectional survey from the Nine-i Investigators Network.

Jordi Rello, Cristina Sarda, Djamel Mokart, Kostoula Arvaniti, Murat Akova, Alexis Tabah, Elie Azoulay, Nine-I study Group

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antimicrobial De-Escalation in Critically Ill Patients.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jordi RelloCRIPS Department, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Research (VHIR), Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina SardaInfectious Diseases Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia, University of Pavia, p. le Golgi 19, 27100, Pavia, Italy. cristina.sarda@gmail.com.
Djamel MokartRéanimation Polyvalente et Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France.
Kostoula ArvanitiIntensive Care Unit, Papageorgiou University Affiliated Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Murat AkovaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Alexis TabahIntensive Care Unit, Redcliffe and Caboolture Hospitals, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Elie AzoulayDépartment of Soins Intensifs, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Nine-I study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A global cross-sectional survey was performed to gather data on the current treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among hematological patients admitted to ICUs worldwide. The survey was performed in April 2019 using an electronic platform (SurveyMonkey®) being distributed among 83 physicians and completed by 48 (57.8%) responders. ESBL Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa were the main concerns. Previous MDR infection (34% of responders), MDR colonization (20%) and previous antibiotic exposure within the last 3 months (20.5%) were considered the most relevant risk factors of bloodstream infection (BSI) due to MDR bacteria. In 48.8% of the ICUs, there was no antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) team focused on hematological patients. Updates on local epidemiology of MDR pathogens were provided in 98% of the centers, using phone or verbal communications (56.1% and 53.7%, respectively). In presence of febrile neutropenia, initial therapy consisted of anti-Gram-negative plus anti-Gram-positive antibiotics for 41% of participants. Antibiotic de-escalation and/or discontinuation of therapy were considered as a promising strategy for the prevention of MDR development (32.4%). Factors associated with antibiotic de-escalation were clinical improvement (43.6%) and neutrophil count recovery (12.8%). Infectious Disease consultation and AMS interventions were not determining factors for de-escalation decisions (more than 50% of responders). Infection control and educational programs were valued as necessary measures for implementation by ICU practitioners. These findings should guide future efforts on collaborative team working, improving compliance with adequate treatment protocols, implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in critically ill hematological patients, and educational activities.

Indexed as

Global HealthAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial StewardshipCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsHematologyHumansInformation ServicesIntensive Care UnitsSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial de-escalation (ADE)Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS)Difficult to treat organismsFebrile neutropenia (FN)Intensive care unitMultidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteriaPneumoniaSeptic shock

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.