Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707429›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Assessment of the impact of 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines in management of differentiated thyroid cancer patients.

Sayak Choudhury, Archi Agrawal, Gouri Pantvaidya, Sneha Shah, Nilendu Purandare, Ameya Puranik, Venkatesh Rangarajan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic and Prognostic Role ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sayak ChoudhuryDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Archi AgrawalDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Gouri PantvaidyaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Sneha ShahDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Nilendu PurandareDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Ameya PuranikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India.
Venkatesh RangarajanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhaba National Institute (HBNI), E. Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, 400 012, India. drvrangarajan@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) guideline have suggested modifications in the risk stratification (RS) for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, introduced the concept of dynamic risk stratification (DRS) and redefined the role of radioactive iodine (RAI) in treatment algorithm. The aim of this retrospective audit was to assess the practical implications of these modifications in management of DTC.

methodsA total of 138 DTC patients were stratified according to ATA 2009 and 2015 guidelines into low (LR), intermediate (IR) and high (HR) risk groups. Change in RS and in intention of RAI use was calculated. Deviation in administered RAI dosage from the guidelines was assessed. 1-year follow-up data was audited to assess how the DRS modified the initial risk estimate.

resultsA total of 11.6% of patients changed their RS categories in 2015 guidelines. A total of 10.1% got upstaged to HR, and 1.4% got downstaged to LR. In 2.17% of patients' intention of RAI use changed to remnant ablation from adjuvant therapy and 65% of the LR patients won't require any RAI therapy. A total of 26.7% of patients had received significantly more RAI dosage according to ATA 2015. At 1-year follow-up according to DRS 84% of LR, 75% of IR and 44% of HR patients showed excellent response (ER).

conclusionMore patients changed RS to HR than to LR. Intention of RAI use changed in only a small number of patients. Significantly higher dosage of RAI is being administered to patients in current practice. The effect of DRS in modifying the initial RS was most prominent in IR, with most showing ER to initial therapy.

Indexed as

Iodine RadioisotopesThyroid NeoplasmsHumansRetrospective StudiesThyroidectomyUnited StatesIodine RadioisotopesAmerican Thyroid AssociationDifferentiated thyroid cancerDynamic risk stratificationRadioactive iodineRisk stratification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.