ArticleSaudi medical journal2019
Assessment of safety and effectiveness of oral multiple sclerosis medication.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Achievement of No Evidence of Disease Activity-3 with Oral Disease-Modifying Treatment in Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the effectiveness and safety profile of the new disease modifying drugs (fingolimod, teriflunomide, and dimethyl fumarate) at a local hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort, where institutional review board approval was granted in December 2015. The study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Demographic variables (age, gender, disease onset, and duration on medication), clinical variables (medication side effects and radiological findings), in addition to relapse frequency per year was collected.
resultsFifty-seven patients' records were retrieved from the pharmacy and included in the analysis. Eight patients were on teriflunomide, 5 patients on dimethyl fumarate and 44 patients on fingolimod were enrolled. The patients' average age was 32.5 years with female gender representing 63% the study population. Annual relapse rates were 0.24, 0.34, and 0.5 per patient per year for those taking fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate, and teriflunomide, correspondingly, lymphopenia (91.4%), neutropenia (23%), and bradycardia (16%) were the most reported side effects for fingolimod therapy.
conclusionThe study results were able to capture the effectiveness rate for the targeted treatment in the studied population, with the frequency of incidence of side effects. However, as these results cannot be generalized for the entire Saudi population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.