ReviewAmerican heart journal2020
Clinical and regulatory landscape for cardiogenic shock: A report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium ThinkTank on cardiogenic shock.
Review in American heart journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06475456 (SPOKE-HUB SHOCK PROTOCOL MANAGEMENT ACCORDING TO SCAI CLASS IN TURIN AND MILAN AREA), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Spoke-hub shock protocol management according to scai class in turin and milan area
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Baseline Cardiogenic Shock Severity on Outcomes in Patients Treated With Impella Device.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- The impact of cardiogenic shock and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on the outcome of acute myocardial infarction: a national-level analysis.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A Framework for Exception From Informed Consent in Trials Enrolling Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Clinical Trials in Cardiogenic Shock: Challenges and Solutions for the Future.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Review
- Treatment Intensity for the Management of Cardiogenic Shock: Comparison Between STEMI and Non-STEMI.JACC. Advances · 2023Article
- Reflecting on the advancements of HFrEF therapies over the last two decades and predicting what is yet to come.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022Article
- Position Statement on Vascular Access Safety for Percutaneous Devices in AMI Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2022Review
- A Standardized and Regionalized Network of Care for Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Heart failure · 2022Article
- Advocacy and Legislation for Regionalization Practices in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: The Time Is Now.US cardiology · 2022Review
- Cardiogenic Shock Management and Research: Past, Present, and Future Outlook.US cardiology · 2022Review
- Review
- Cardiogenic Shock: Protocols, Teams, Centers, and Networks.US cardiology · 2021Review
- The Contemporary Cardiogenic Shock 'Playbook'.US cardiology · 2021Article
- Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Review
- Cardiac safety research consortium "shock II" think tank report: Advancing practical approaches to generating evidence for the treatment of cardiogenic shock.American heart journal · 2020Article
- Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Article
- A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock.JACC. Heart failure · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.