Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31707184›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2019

An examination of the relationship between shame, guilt and self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kate Sheehy, Amna Noureen, Ayesha Khaliq, Katie Dhingra, Nusrat Husain, Eleanor E Pontin, Rosanne Cawley, Peter J Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Networks of guilt, shame, pride, and disordered eating in youths show stability over time.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kate SheehyInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Kate.Sheehy@merseycare.nhs.uk.
Amna NoureenPakistan Institute of Living & Learning, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address: Amna.Naureen@pill.org.pk.
Ayesha KhaliqPakistan Institute of Living & Learning, Karachi, Pakistan. Electronic address: Ayesha.Khaliq@pill.org.pk.
Katie DhingraSchool of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, LS1 3HE England, United Kingdom.
Nusrat HusainDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Nusrat.Husain@manchester.ac.uk.
Eleanor E PontinInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Ellie.Pontin@nhs.net.
Rosanne CawleyInstitute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Rosanne.Cawley@mft.nhs.uk.
Peter J TaylorDivision of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Peter.Taylor-2@Manchester.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBPakistan Institute of Learning and Living · PKLeeds Beckett University · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N006062/1Medical Research Council MR/R022461/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-harm is a major public health concern associated with suicide risk and significant psychological distress. Theories suggest that aversive emotional states are an important process that drives self-harm. Shame and guilt may, in particular, be important emotions in self-harm. This review therefore sought to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between shame, guilt, and self-harm. A systematic search of electronic databases (PsycINFO; Medline; CINAHL Plus; Web of Science and ProQuest) was undertaken to identify studies measuring shame, guilt and self-harm (including suicidal and non-suicidal behaviour). Meta-analysis was undertaken where papers focused on the same subtype of shame or guilt and shared a common outcome. Thirty studies were identified for inclusion. Most forms of shame were associated with non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), but research was sparse concerning suicidal behaviour. Fewer studies examined guilt and findings were more varied. Methodological issues included a paucity of longitudinal designs and lack of justification for sample sizes. Results of this review support the link between shame and self-harm, particularly NSSI. The direction of this relationship is yet to be established. Clinically, consideration should be given to the role of shame amongst individuals who present with NSSI. This review was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42017056165).

Indexed as

GuiltShameHumansSelf-Injurious BehaviorGuiltNon-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)Self-harmShameSuicideSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31707184
PMCPMC6891258
OpenAlexW2974854867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.