Trial reportJournal of pain and symptom management2020
Multisymptom Profile Predicts Increased Risk of Poor Outcomes After Initial Placement of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.
Trial report in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social Determinants of Health-Related Outcomes in an Intervention Following Initial Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Implantation.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Symptom Experiences and Coping Strategies in Turkish Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Cross-Sectional Study Based on Interviews.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextPatients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are at risk for multiple physical and psychological symptoms. Identification of specific symptom profiles associated with poor outcomes may elucidate novel strategies to enhance symptom management.
objectivesThe objectives were to determine common symptoms after initial ICD implantation, identify classes of individuals with similar symptom profiles, describe patient characteristics associated with different symptom profiles, and determine if symptom profiles at hospital discharge predicted outcomes three and 12 months after implantation.
methodsThis was a secondary data analysis of a randomized controlled trial that compared patient + partner versus patient-only interventions designed to help patients manage symptoms, prepare for ICD shocks, and resume daily activities. Symptoms were measured with the Patient Concerns Assessment. Latent class regression analysis was used to identify symptom classes at baseline, three-month, and 12-month follow-up. Associations between patient characteristics, class membership, and outcomes were examined using chi-square, analysis of variance, and Poisson regression.
resultsThe study included 301 patients (74% male, mean age 64 ± 11.9 years). Three classes were identified: Multi-Symptom (N = 119, 40%), Tired-Rundown (N = 130, 43%), and Mostly Asymptomatic (N = 52, 17%). Patients in the Multi-Symptom class were younger (59.9 years, P < 0.001) and reported more anxiety (P < 0.001) and depression (P < 0.01) than the other classes. Membership in the Multi-Symptom class predicted lower quality of life and resulted in nearly double the rate of hospitalizations after 12 months (P = 0.02, IRR 1.9).
conclusionEvaluation of symptom profiles after ICD implantation offers a promising strategy for identifying patients at risk for poor health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.