Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31706361›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

A two-stage retrospective analysis to determine the effect of entry point on higher exit of proximal pins in lateral pinning of supracondylar humerus fracture in children.

Xianglu Ji, Allieu Kamara, Enbo Wang, Tianjing Liu, Liwei Shi, Lianyong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. [Research progress in the treatment of distal humeral metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction fracture in children].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xianglu JiDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Allieu KamaraDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Enbo WangDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China. wangenbodor@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3394-2670
Tianjing LiuDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Liwei ShiDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.
Lianyong LiDepartment of Pediatric Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKirschner wire fixation remains to be the mainstream treatment modality in unstable or displaced supracondylar humerus fracture in children, with divergent lateral pins being the most preferred due to their sufficient stability and decreased risk of ulnar nerve injury. However, the entry point at which the proximal lateral pin can be inserted to achieve a more proximal exit and maximum divergence has not been reported. This study retrospectively analyzed the characteristics and factors influencing the entry and exit points of the proximal lateral pins.

methodsThe study was divided into two stages. In stage one, the entry and exit points of the proximal pins of lateral pinning configuration were analyzed from intra-operative radiographs of children treated for extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures. The coronal and sagittal pin angles formed by the proximal pins were also measured. Using the findings of stage one, we intentionally tried to achieve a more proximal exit with the proximal pins in stage two. Comparisons between groups of patients treated by random and intentional pinnings were done statistically.

resultsIn the first stage, 47 (29.2%) of the 161 proximal pins exited above the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction (MDJ) region. Of these, 85.1% entered from lateral and posterior to the ossific nucleus of the capitellum (ONC). The pin angles averaged 58.4° and 90.5° in the coronal and sagittal planes respectively. In the second stage, 47 (65.3%) proximal pins in the intended group exited above the MDJ region, while only 32 (36%) in the random group exited above the MDJ region.

conclusionWhile aiming at the upper border of the distal MDJ during pinning, lateral pins can easily achieve a higher, proximal exit above the MDJ if inserted from lateral and posterior to the ONC and parallel to the humeral shaft in the sagittal plane. Higher exit can also be easily achieved in younger patients and patients fixated with smaller diameter pins.

Indexed as

Bone NailsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFracture Fixation, InternalHumansHumeral FracturesInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesEntry pointExit pointPinning fixationProximal pinSupracondylar humerus fracture

Identifiers

PMID31706361
PMCPMC6842475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.