Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31706338›Full record

SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2019

Impact of the 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation and of the resulting limited financial coverage by the Italian Medicines Agency for palivizumab prophylaxis on the RSV-associated hospitalizations in preterm infants during the 2016-2017 epidemic season: a systematic review of seven Italian reports.

Renato Cutrera, Andrea Wolfler, Simonetta Picone, Giovanni A Rossi, Giuliana Gualberti, Rocco Merolla, Antonio Del Vecchio, Alberto Villani, Fabio Midulla, Andrea Dotta

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Renato CutreraPediatric Pulmonology and Sleep & Long-Term Ventilation Unit, Pediatric Intermediate Care Unit, Academic Pediatric Department, Pediatric Hospital "Bambino Gesù", Rome, Italy.
Andrea WolflerDivision of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital V Buzzi, Milan, Italy.
Simonetta PiconeNeonatology-NICU "Casilino" General Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni A RossiDepartment of Pediatrics, Pulmonology and Allergy Units, "Giannina Gaslini" Institute, Genoa, Italy.
Giuliana GualbertiMedical Department, AbbVie Italy, Rome, Italy.
Rocco MerollaMedical Department, AbbVie Italy, Rome, Italy.
Antonio Del VecchioDepartment of Women's and Children Health, "Di Venere" Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Alberto VillaniPediatric and Infectious Disease Unit, Academic Pediatric Department, Pediatric Hospital "Bambino Gesù", Rome, Italy.
Fabio MidullaPediatric Department, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy. midulla@uniroma1.it.
Andrea DottaNeonatology Unit, Academic Pediatric Department, Pediatric Hospital "Bambino Gesù", Rome, Italy.

Funding

AbbVie srl No grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe only pharmacologic prophylaxis against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection in preterm infants is the humanized monoclonal antibody palivizumab. After the 2014 modification of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) limited the financial coverage for palivizumab prescriptions to otherwise healthy preterm infants with < 29 weeks of gestational age (wGA) aged < 12 months at the beginning of the 2016-2017 RSV season. However, due to the effect on disease severity and hospitalizations following this limitation, shown by several Italian clinical studies, in November 2017 AIFA reinstated the financial coverage for these infants. In this systematic review, we critically summarize the data that show the importance of palivizumab prophylaxis.

methodsData from six Italian pediatric institutes and the Italian Network of Pediatric Intensive Care Units (TIPNet) were retrieved from the literature and considered. The epidemiologic information for infants 29-36 wGA, aged < 12 months and admitted for viral-induced acute lower respiratory tract infection were retrospectively reviewed. RSV-associated hospitalizations were compared between the season with running limitation, i.e. 2016-2017, versus 2 seasons before (2014-2015 and 2015-2016) and one season after (2017-2018) the AIFA limitation.

resultsDuring the 2016-2017 RSV epidemic season, when the AIFA limited the financial coverage of palivizumab prophylaxis based on the 2014 AAP recommendation, the study reports on a higher incidences of RSV bronchiolitis and greater respiratory function impairment. During this season, we also found an increase in hospitalizations and admissions to the Pediatric Intensive Care Units and longer hospital stays, incurring higher healthcare costs. During the 2016-2017 epidemic season, an overall increase in the number of RSV bronchiolitis cases was also observed in infants born full term, suggesting that the decreased prophylaxis in preterm infants may have caused a wider infection diffusion in groups of infants not considered to be at risk.

conclusionsThe Italian results support the use of palivizumab prophylaxis for otherwise healthy preterm (29-36 wGA) infants aged < 6 months at the beginning of the RSV season.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAntiviral AgentsEpidemicsHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesItalyPalivizumabRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsUnited StatesAntiviral AgentsPalivizumabBronchiolitisPalivizumabPreterm infants, pediatric intensive care unitsProphylaxisRespiratory syncytial virus

Identifiers

PMID31706338
PMCPMC6842491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.