Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31706333›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2019

Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia - clinical case report, literature review, and differential diagnosis.

Benito Benitez, Julia Mülli, Alexandar Tzankov, Christoph Kunz

Open access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Eosinophils and the Head and Neck.Head and neck pathology · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Vitamin D on the Wound Healing Process: A Case Series.International medical case reports journal · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Traumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia: A puzzle.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benito BenitezDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland. benito.benitez@usb.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4459-6603
Julia MülliDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Alexandar TzankovDepartment of Histopathology, Institute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 40, 4031, Basel, Switzerland.
Christoph KunzDepartment of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, CH-4031, Basel, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophilia (TUGSE) is a rare self-limiting condition of the oral mucosa. The lesion manifests as an isolated ulcer that can be either asymptomatic or associated with mild to severe pain, and in most cases, it affects the tongue. TUGSE lesions may mimic malignancy such as squamous cell carcinoma, CD30 positive lymphoproliferative disorder, or infectious diseases such as primary syphilis, tuberculosis, or Epstein-Barr virus mucocutaneous ulcer. Histologically dominating cells are lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosinophils. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a TUGSE case of a patient with a solitary ulcer on the lower left retromolar buccal plane. Upon presentation, the patient reported a swelling on the buccal mucosa of the left lower jaw since 1 year with rapid growth over the last days and mild pain while chewing. The diameter of the intraoral lesion on the lower left retromolar buccal plane was approximately 4 × 3 cm; the lesion presented as indurated base with a central superficial ulceration of 2 × 1 cm, indicative for a malignant process. Histologically, the ulceration showed an expanding, infiltrative, and vaguely granulomatous morphology, involving the superficial mucosa and the fatty tissue, and extended between the deep striated muscle fibers. The lesion was rich in lymphocytes, histiocytes, and eosionophils intermingled with activated T-blasts without phenotypic abnormalities. TUGSE was then diagnosed based on the phenotype (especially the lacking expression of CD30, the retained T-cell phenotype, and the absence of Epstein-Barr virus), the clinical presentation, and the morphology. Twenty-six months after diagnosis, no recurrence of the ulceration was seen.

conclusionsAs TUGSE may mimic malignancy or infectious diseases, biopsy is mandatory and should be combined with thorough clinical examination. A screening for infectious diseases (mainly syphilis, Epstein-Barr virus, and HIV infections) must be performed routinely. In most cases, the lesions resolve spontaneously, obviating the need of further actions other than clinical follow-up. The pathogenesis of TUGSE lesions is still under debate, although local traumatic events and a locotypic immune response have been suggested to be major contributing factors.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellDiagnosis, DifferentialEosinophilic GranulomaEpstein-Barr Virus InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMouth MucosaMouth NeoplasmsOral UlcerRare DiseasesRemission, SpontaneousSyphilisTuberculosisRiga-Fede diseaseTraumatic ulcerative granuloma with stromal eosinophiliaTUGSETUGSE lesions

Identifiers

PMID31706333
PMCPMC6842515
OpenAlexW2988073440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.