Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31706297›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Comparison of three surgical approaches for thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis: a multicentre, retrospective study.

Yanping Zeng, Peng Cheng, Jiulin Tan, Zhilin Li, Yuan Chen, Li Tao Li, Yonghong Zheng, Gaoju Wang, Jianzhong Xu, Zehua Zhang

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Current status of surgical treatment for angular kyphosis in spinal tuberculosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mid- and Long-Term Efficacy of Surgical Treatment of L1-2 Vertebral Tuberculosis with Subdiaphragmatic Extraperitoneal Approach.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yanping ZengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Peng ChengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Jiulin TanDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zhilin LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lanzhou Military Region General Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
Yuan ChenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Yulin People's Hospital, Yulin, China.
Li Tao LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, 8th Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital Tuberculosis Research Institute, Beijing, China.
Yonghong ZhengDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xi'an Jiaotong University Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Gaoju WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
Jianzhong XuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Zehua ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China. zhangzehuatmmu@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81672193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe surgical approaches to thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis were controversial. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of three different procedures through a multicentre retrospective study.

methodsThe medical records of thoracolumbar junction tuberculosis patients (n = 177) from January 2005 to January 2015 were collected and reviewed. Forty-five patients underwent anterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group A), 52 underwent anterior combined with posterior debridement and instrumented fusion (Group B) and 80 underwent posterior-only debridement and instrumented fusion (Group C). Patients with neurological deficit were 10 in Group A, 23 in Group B, 36 in Group C. All patients had a standard preoperative and postoperative anti - tuberculous therapy regimen. Clinical outcomes, laboratory indexes and radiological evaluation of the three groups were compared. Operations at each centre were performed by the respective senior medical teams of the six different hospitals.

resultsAll three surgical approaches achieved bone fusion and pain relief. Cases with neurological deficits had different degrees of improvement after surgery. The operative time was 330.2 ± 45.4 min, 408.0 ± 54.3 min, 227.9 ± 58.5 min, and the blood loss was 744.0 ± 193.8 ml, 1134.6 ± 328.2 ml, 349.8 ± 289.4 ml in groups A, B and C respectively. The average loss of correction was 5.5 ± 3.7° in group A, 1.6 ± 1.9° in group B, 1.7 ± 2.2° in group C, and the difference between groups except B vs C were of statistically significant (P < 0.05).

conclusionsFor patients with thoracolumbar junction (T12-L1) tuberculosis, the posterior-only procedure is the better than the anterior-only procedure in the correction of kyphosis and maintenance of spinal stability. The posterior-only procedure is recommended because it achieves the same efficacy as combined procedure with shorter operation time, less blood loss and trauma.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntitubercular AgentsBack PainBlood Loss, SurgicalDebridementDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInternal FixatorsLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePain MeasurementAntitubercular AgentsOutcomeSpinal tuberculosisSurgical treatmentThoracolumbar junction lesion

Identifiers

PMID31706297
PMCPMC6842549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.