ReviewBiochemical pharmacology2020
Mouse models in hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy and genome editing.
Review in Biochemical pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A guide to cell-type-specific Cre mouse models in atherosclerosis: from background strains to future directions.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas genome editing for human therapeutics: Progress and challenges.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Multiplex base editing to protect from CD33 directed drugs for immune and gene therapy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Development of a novel and viable knock-in factor V deficiency murine model: Utility for an ultra-rare disease.PloS one · 2025Article
- DNA contamination within recombinant adeno-associated virus preparations correlates with decreased CD34Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024Article
- Challenges and innovations in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: exploring bone marrow niches and new model systems.BMB reports · 2024Review
- Choosing the right mouse model: comparison of humanized NSG and NBSGW mice for in vivo HSC gene therapy.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Catching Them Early: Framework Parameters and Progress for Prenatal and Childhood Application of Advanced Therapies.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- CRISPR/Cas9 for the treatment of haematological diseases: a journey from bacteria to the bedside.British journal of haematology · 2021Review
- Gene Therapies for Primary Immune Deficiencies.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- AMD3100 redosing fails to repeatedly mobilize hematopoietic stem cells in the nonhuman primate and humanized mouse.Experimental hematology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene therapy has become an important treatment option for a variety of hematological diseases. The biggest advances have been made with CAR T cells and many of those studies are now FDA approved as a routine treatment for some hematologic malignancies. Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy is not far behind with treatment approvals granted for beta-hemoglobinopathies and adenosine deaminase severe combined immune deficiency (ADA-SCID), and additional approbations currently being sought. With the current pace of research, the significant investment of biotech companies, and the continuously growing toolbox of viral as well as non-viral gene delivery methods, the development of new ex vivo and in vivo gene therapy approaches is at an all-time high. Research in the field of gene therapy has been ongoing for more than 4 decades with big success stories as well as devastating drawbacks along the way. In particular, the damaging effect of uncontrolled viral vector integration observed in the initial gene therapy applications in the 90s led to a more comprehensive upfront safety assessment of treatment strategies. Since the late 90s, an important read-out to comprehensively assess the quality and safety of cell products has come forward with the mouse xenograft model. Here, we review the use of mouse models across the different stages of basic, pre-clinical and translational research towards the clinical application of HSC-mediated gene therapy and editing approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.