Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31705740›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2020

Transient perturbation of the left temporal cortex evokes plasticity-related reconfiguration of the lexical network.

Jana Klaus, Dennis J L G Schutter, Vitória Piai

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Causal evidence for a coordinated temporal interplay within the language network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  7. Naturalistic Spoken Language Comprehension Is Supported by Alpha and Beta Oscillations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Jana KlausDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4398-8672
Dennis J L G SchutterDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Vitória PiaiDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While much progress has been made in how brain organization supports language function, the language network's ability to adapt to immediate disturbances by means of reorganization remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine acute reorganizational changes in brain activity related to conceptual and lexical retrieval in unimpaired language production following transient disruption of the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG). In a randomized single-blind within-subject experiment, we recorded the electroencephalogram from 16 healthy participants during a context-driven picture-naming task. Prior to the task, the left MTG was perturbed with real continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) or sham stimulation. During the task, participants read lead-in sentences creating a constraining (e.g., "The farmer milks the") or nonconstraining context (e.g., "The farmer buys the"). The last word was shown as a picture that participants had to name (e.g., "cow"). Replicating behavioral studies, participants were overall faster in naming pictures following a constraining relative to a nonconstraining context, but this effect did not differ between real and sham cTBS. In contrast, real cTBS increased overall error rates compared to sham cTBS. In line with previous studies, we observed a decrease in alpha-beta (8-24 Hz) oscillatory power for constraining relative to nonconstraining contexts over left temporal-parietal cortex after participants received sham cTBS. However, following real cTBS, this decrease extended toward left prefrontal regions associated with both domain-general and domain-specific control mechanisms. Our findings provide evidence that immediately after perturbing the left MTG, the lexical-semantic network is able to quickly reconfigure, also recruiting domain-general regions.

Indexed as

PsycholinguisticsTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBrain WavesFemaleHumansMaleNerve NetNeuronal PlasticityPattern Recognition, VisualPrefrontal CortexReadingSingle-Blind MethodSpeechTemporal LobeYoung Adultcortical reorganizationcTBSEEGlanguage production

Identifiers

PMID31705740
PMCPMC7267941
OpenAlexW2985363391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.