Trial reportHuman brain mapping2020
Transient perturbation of the left temporal cortex evokes plasticity-related reconfiguration of the lexical network.
Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transient perturbation of the left temporal cortex evokes plasticity-related reconfiguration of the lexical network.Human brain mapping · 2020Trial
- Relationship between intrahemispheric and interhemispheric connectivity of the language network and language improvement in subacute post-stroke aphasia.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- The Concise Language Paradigm (CLaP), a framework for studying the intersection of comprehension and production: electrophysiological properties.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Alpha and Beta Oscillations Differentially Support Word Production in a Rule-Switching Task.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Distinct parallel activation and interaction between dorsal and ventral pathways during phonological and semantic processing: A cTBS-fMRI study.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Causal evidence for a coordinated temporal interplay within the language network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Naturalistic Spoken Language Comprehension Is Supported by Alpha and Beta Oscillations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Time course of right-hemisphere recruitment during word production following left-hemisphere damage: A single case of young stroke.The European journal of neuroscience · 2022Article
- Are alpha and beta oscillations spatially dissociated over the cortex in context-driven spoken-word production?Psychophysiology · 2022Article
- Neuromodulatory effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on language performance in healthy participants: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Across-session consistency of context-driven language processing: A magnetoencephalography study.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While much progress has been made in how brain organization supports language function, the language network's ability to adapt to immediate disturbances by means of reorganization remains unclear. The aim of this study was to examine acute reorganizational changes in brain activity related to conceptual and lexical retrieval in unimpaired language production following transient disruption of the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG). In a randomized single-blind within-subject experiment, we recorded the electroencephalogram from 16 healthy participants during a context-driven picture-naming task. Prior to the task, the left MTG was perturbed with real continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) or sham stimulation. During the task, participants read lead-in sentences creating a constraining (e.g., "The farmer milks the") or nonconstraining context (e.g., "The farmer buys the"). The last word was shown as a picture that participants had to name (e.g., "cow"). Replicating behavioral studies, participants were overall faster in naming pictures following a constraining relative to a nonconstraining context, but this effect did not differ between real and sham cTBS. In contrast, real cTBS increased overall error rates compared to sham cTBS. In line with previous studies, we observed a decrease in alpha-beta (8-24 Hz) oscillatory power for constraining relative to nonconstraining contexts over left temporal-parietal cortex after participants received sham cTBS. However, following real cTBS, this decrease extended toward left prefrontal regions associated with both domain-general and domain-specific control mechanisms. Our findings provide evidence that immediately after perturbing the left MTG, the lexical-semantic network is able to quickly reconfigure, also recruiting domain-general regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.