ReviewJournal of biomedical optics2019
Multidomain computational modeling of photoacoustic imaging: verification, validation, and image quality prediction.
Review in Journal of biomedical optics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A virtual imaging framework for three-dimensional quantitative optoacoustic tomography using stochastic numerical breast phantoms.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Real-time deep learning-based vascular recognition in clinical breast photoacoustic imaging.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- Application of a virtual imaging framework for investigating a deep learning-based reconstruction method for 3D quantitative photoacoustic computed tomography.Photoacoustics · 2026Article
- 4D spectral-spatial computational photoacoustic dermoscopy.Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Stochastic three-dimensional numerical phantoms to enable computational studies in quantitative optoacoustic computed tomography of breast cancer.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Photoacoustic-Based Devices for Biomedical Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Modeling toolchain for realistic simulation of photoacoustic data acquisition.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- SIMPA: an open-source toolkit for simulation and image processing for photonics and acoustics.Journal of biomedical optics · 2022Article
- Modeling combined ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging: Simulations aiding device development and artificial intelligence.Photoacoustics · 2021Article
- Photoacoustic tomography reconstruction using lag-based delay multiply and sum with a coherence factor improves in vivo ovarian cancer diagnosis.Biomedical optics express · 2021Article
- Evaluation of Fluence Correction Algorithms in Multispectral Photoacoustic Imaging.Photoacoustics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As photoacoustic imaging (PAI) technology matures, computational modeling will increasingly represent a critical tool for facilitating clinical translation through predictive simulation of real-world performance under a wide range of device and biological conditions. While modeling currently offers a rapid, inexpensive tool for device development and prediction of fundamental image quality metrics (e.g., spatial resolution and contrast ratio), rigorous verification and validation will be required of models used to provide regulatory-grade data that effectively complements and/or replaces in vivo testing. To address methods for establishing model credibility, we developed an integrated computational model of PAI by coupling a previously developed three-dimensional Monte Carlo model of tissue light transport with a two-dimensional (2D) acoustic wave propagation model implemented in the well-known k-Wave toolbox. We then evaluated ability of the model to predict basic image quality metrics by applying standardized verification and validation principles for computational models. The model was verified against published simulation data and validated against phantom experiments using a custom PAI system. Furthermore, we used the model to conduct a parametric study of optical and acoustic design parameters. Results suggest that computationally economical 2D acoustic models can adequately predict spatial resolution, but metrics such as signal-to-noise ratio and penetration depth were difficult to replicate due to challenges in modeling strong clutter observed in experimental images. Parametric studies provided quantitative insight into complex relationships between transducer characteristics and image quality as well as optimal selection of optical beam geometry to ensure adequate image uniformity. Multidomain PAI simulation tools provide high-quality tools to aid device development and prediction of real-world performance, but further work is needed to improve model fidelity, especially in reproducing image noise and clutter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.