Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31705613›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied microbiology2020

An easy-to-perform, culture-free Campylobacter point-of-management assay for processing plant applications.

M G Mason, P J Blackall, J R Botella, J M Templeton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Super-Fast Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review of methods for the detection ofJournal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M G MasonPlant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5860-7989
P J BlackallQueensland Alliance for Agriculture and Food Innovation, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4107-9451
J R BotellaPlant Genetic Engineering Laboratory, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Qld, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4446-3432
J M TempletonAnimal Science, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, EcoSciences Precinct, Dutton Park, Qld, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0307-2638

Funding

Agrifutures Australia PRJ-009841Queensland Department of Agriculture and Fisheries
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCurrent culture-based methods for detection and determination of Campylobacter levels on processed chickens takes at least 2 days. Here we sought to develop a new complete, low-cost and rapid (approximately 2·5 h) detection system requiring minimal operator input. METHODS AND

resultsWe observed a strong correlation between culture-based cell counts and our ability to detect either Campylobacter jejuni or Campylobacter coli by loop-mediated isothermal amplification from the same samples. This knowledge was used to develop a rapid and simple five-step assay to quantify Campylobacter, which was subsequently assessed for its specificity, reproducibility and accuracy in quantifying Campylobacter levels from processed chickens. The assay was found to be highly specific for C. jejuni and C. coli and was capable of distinguishing between samples that are either within or exceeding the industry set target of 6000 Campylobacter colony forming units (CFU) per carcass (equivalent to 12 CFU per ml of chicken rinse) with >90% accuracy relative to culture-based methods.

conclusionsOur method can reliably quantify Campylobacter counts of processed chickens with an accuracy comparable to culture-based assays but provides results within hours as opposed to days. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The research presented here will help improve food safety by providing fast Campylobacter detection that will enable the implementation of real-time risk management strategies in poultry processing plants to rapidly test processed chickens and identify effective intervention strategies. This technology is a powerful tool that can be easily adapted for other organisms and thus could be highly beneficial for a broad range of industries.

Indexed as

AnimalsCampylobacterCampylobacter coliCampylobacter jejuniChickensFood-Processing IndustryNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReproducibility of ResultsCampylobacterdiagnosticfood-safetyisothermal amplificationpoultry

Identifiers

PMID31705613
PMCPMC7027919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.