Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31705482›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2019

Jointly discussing care plans for real-life patients: The potential of a student-led interprofessional team meeting in undergraduate health professions education.

Marion van Lierop, Jerôme van Dongen, Miriam Janssen, Hester Smeets, Loes van Bokhoven, Albine Moser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. WHIRL Study: Workplace Health Interprofessional Learning in the Construction Industry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marion van LieropDepartment of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. marion.vanlierop@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Jerôme van DongenResearch Centre for Community Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Miriam JanssenDepartment of Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hester SmeetsFaculty of Health, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Loes van BokhovenCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Albine MoserCAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterprofessional education is promoted as a means of enhancing future collaborative practice in healthcare. We developed a learning activity in which undergraduate medical, nursing and allied healthcare students practice interprofessional collaboration during a student-led interprofessional team meeting. DESIGN AND DELIVERY: During their clinical rotation at a family physician's practice, each medical student visits a frail elderly patient and prepares a care plan for the patient. At a student-led interprofessional team meeting, medical, nursing and allied healthcare students jointly review these care plans. Subsequently, participating students reflect on their interprofessional collaboration during the team meeting, both collectively and individually. Every 4 weeks, six interprofessional team meetings take place. Each team comprises 9-10 students from various healthcare professions, and meets once. To date an average of 360 medical and 360 nursing and allied healthcare students have participated in this course annually. EVALUATION: Students mostly reported positive experiences, including the opportunity to learn with, from and about other healthcare professions in the course of jointly reviewing care plans, and feeling collectively responsible for the care of the patients involved. Additionally, students reported a better understanding of the contextual factors at hand. The variety of patient cases, diversity of participating health professions, and the course material need improvement.

conclusionStudents from participating institutions confirmed that attending a student-led interprofessional team meeting had enabled them to learn with, from and about other health professions in an active role. The use of real-life cases and the educational design contributed to the positive outcome of this interprofessional learning activity.

Indexed as

AdultCooperative BehaviorEducation, Medical, UndergraduateFamily PracticeFemaleHealth OccupationsHumansInterprofessional RelationsMalePatient Care PlanningPatient Care TeamProblem-Based LearningStudents, Health OccupationsInterprofessional educationInterprofessional learningInterprofessional team meetingProblem based learning

Identifiers

PMID31705482
PMCPMC6904407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.