ArticleClinical rheumatology2020
Association of African-American ethnicity and smoking status with total and individual damage index in systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of diabetes mellitus in systemic lupus erythematosus: systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2024Pooled it
- The SLICC/ACR damage index, assessed using a community-based electronic healthcare record, predicts mortality in SLE patients: results from the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Development of a Conceptual Model to Understand Disease Burden in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Organ Damage.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2023Article
- Long-term outcomes in systemic lupus erythematosus: trends over time and major contributors.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSmoking has been associated with increased incidence, severity of cutaneous lupus, and lupus activity. We looked at the association of both smoking and ethnicity with the individual damage items from the SLICC/ACR Damage Index.
methodsPoisson regression was used to model the total SLICC/ACR Damage Index score against ever smoking. Cox regression was used to assess the relationship between time to individual damage items and ever smoking. Furthermore, we compared SLICC/ACR Damage Index items among African-American and Caucasian ever smokers.
resultsThe study included 2629 patients, 52.6% Caucasian and 39.3% African-American. The prevalence of ever smokers was 35.8%. There was no significant difference in total SLICC/ACR Damage Index score between ever smokers and never smokers after adjustment for ethnicity, gender, age at diagnosis, and years of education. Ever smokers had more atherosclerotic cardiovascular damage and skin damage compared to non-smokers. Caucasian SLE patients who ever smoked were more likely to have muscle atrophy and atherosclerosis compared to Caucasian non-smokers. African-American patients who ever smoked were more likely to have skin damage compared to African-American non-smokers. African-Americans who smoked were more likely to have many more damage items (cataract, renal damage, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, deforming or erosive arthritis, avascular necrosis, skin damage, and diabetes) compared to Caucasians who smoked.
conclusionOur analysis proved the major effect of smoking on cardiovascular and cutaneous damage. Surprisingly, cardiovascular damage items had higher hazard ratios in Caucasian smokers than non-smokers while skin damage items hazard ratios were higher in African-American smokers compared to non-smokers.Key Points• This study is the largest cohort study to date evaluating the effect of smoking on the cumulative SLICC/ACR Damage Index and its individual damage items.• It is the only study that examined the effect of smoking on individual items of the SLICC/ACR Damage Index in terms of Caucasians vs. African-American ethnicity.• Our analysis proved the major effect of smoking on cardiovascular and cutaneous damage. Compared to non-smokers, Caucasian smokers had higher risk of cardiovascular damage while African-American smokers had more skin damage.• African-Americans who smoked were more likely to have many more damage items (cataract, renal damage, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, deforming or erosive arthritis, avascular necrosis, skin damage, and diabetes) compared to Caucasians who smoked.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.