ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2020
Extended steep ramp test normative values for 19-24-year-old healthy active young adults.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome, Vascular Damage, and Accelerated Aging (MetVasA) After Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematological Malignancy: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Reliability and validity of the steep ramp test to assess cardiorespiratory fitness in apparently healthy adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
- Pain medication associated with decreased physical performance and rehabilitation progress.Pain reports · 2025Article
- Three-dimensional geometric morphometric shape analysis of chest wall kinematics in different breathing conditions.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Racial Differences in Blood Pressure and Autonomic Recovery Following Acute Supramaximal Exercise in Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Multicomponent Exercise Program to Improve the Immediate Sequelae of COVID-19: A Prospective Study with a Brief Report of 2-Year Follow-Up.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo extend currently available sex and age-specific normative values in children and adolescents for the peak work rate (WR
methodsHealthy male and female participants aged between 19 and 24 years were recruited. After screening and anthropometric measurements, participants performed a SRT on a cycle ergometer (increments of 25 W/10 s), monitoring and recording SRT-WR
resultsFifty-seven participants (31 males and 26 females; median age of 21.3 years) volunteered and were tested. Anthropometrics, resting BP and lung function were all within normal ranges. Ninety-three percent of the participants attained a peak HR (HR
conclusionsThe present study provides sex-, age-, body height-, and body mass-related normative values (presented as reference centiles) for absolute and relative SRT performance throughout childhood and early adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.