Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31705256›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Prediction of pulmonary pressure after Glenn shunts by computed tomography-based machine learning models.

Lei Huang, Jiahua Li, Meiping Huang, Jian Zhuang, Haiyun Yuan, Qianjun Jia, Dewen Zeng, Lifeng Que, Yue Xi, Jijin Lin and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Role of artificial intelligence in congenital heart disease.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025
    Review
  3. The molecular mechanisms of cardiac development and related diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lei HuangDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Jiahua LiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Meiping HuangDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jian ZhuangDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Haiyun YuanDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qianjun JiaDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Dewen ZengHuazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Lifeng QueDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yue XiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jijin LinDepartment of Cardiology, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China. doctorlinjijin@126.com.
Yuhao DongDepartment of Catheterization Lab, Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of South China Structural Heart Disease, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China. barbaradong1@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0564-4369
Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

the National key Research and Development Program (2018YFC1002600), Guangdong peak project DFJH201802the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2018A030313785the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province 2019B020230003, 2018B090944002, 2017A070701013, 2017B090904034 and 2017B030314109the Union of National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangdong Province U1401255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to develop non-invasive machine learning classifiers for predicting post-Glenn shunt patients with low and high risks of a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) > 15 mmHg based on preoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT).

methodsThis retrospective study included 96 patients with functional single ventricle who underwent a bidirectional Glenn procedure between November 1, 2009, and July, 31, 2017. All patients underwent post-procedure CT, followed by cardiac catheterization. Overall, 23 morphologic parameters were manually extracted from cardiac CT images for each patient. The Mann-Whitney U or chi-square test was applied to select the most significant predictors. Six machine learning algorithms including logistic regression, Naive Bayes, random forest (RF), linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, and K-nearest neighbor were used for modeling. These algorithms were independently trained on 100 train-validation random splits with a 3:1 ratio. Their average performance was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

resultsSeven CT morphologic parameters were selected for modeling. RF obtained the best performance, with mean AUC of 0.840 (confidence interval [CI] 0.832-0.850) and 0.787 (95% CI 0.780-0.794); sensitivity of 0.815 (95% CI 0.797-0.833) and 0.778 (95% CI 0.767-0.788), specificity of 0.766 (95% CI 0.748-0.785) and 0.746 (95% CI 0.735-0.757); and accuracy of 0.782 (95% CI 0.771-0.793) and 0.756 (95% CI 0.748-0.764) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

conclusionsThe CT-based RF model demonstrates a good performance in the prediction of mPAP, which may reduce the need for right heart catheterization in post-Glenn shunt patients with suspected mPAP > 15 mmHg. KEY POINTS: • Twenty-three candidate descriptors were manually extracted from cardiac computed tomography images, and seven of them were selected for subsequent modeling. • The random forest model presents the best predictive performance for pulmonary pressure among all methods. • The computed tomography-based machine learning model could predict post-Glenn shunt pulmonary pressure non-invasively.

Indexed as

Blood PressureFontan ProcedureSupport Vector MachineAdolescentAlgorithmsBayes TheoremCardiac CatheterizationChildChild, PreschoolDiscriminant AnalysisDouble Outlet Right VentricleFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart Septal DefectsHumansInfantHeart diseasesLungMachine learningMulti-detector computed tomographyPressure

Identifiers

PMID31705256
OpenAlexW2982802031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.