ArticleEuropean radiology2020
Prediction of pulmonary pressure after Glenn shunts by computed tomography-based machine learning models.
Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using artificial intelligence to predict post-operative outcomes in congenital heart surgeries: a systematic review.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Pooled it
- Role of artificial intelligence in congenital heart disease.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2025Review
- The molecular mechanisms of cardiac development and related diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Congenital Heart Disease: Current State and Prospects.JACC. Advances · 2022Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Cardiology: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- The role of machine learning applications in diagnosing and assessing critical and non-critical CHD: a scoping review.Cardiology in the young · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop non-invasive machine learning classifiers for predicting post-Glenn shunt patients with low and high risks of a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) > 15 mmHg based on preoperative cardiac computed tomography (CT).
methodsThis retrospective study included 96 patients with functional single ventricle who underwent a bidirectional Glenn procedure between November 1, 2009, and July, 31, 2017. All patients underwent post-procedure CT, followed by cardiac catheterization. Overall, 23 morphologic parameters were manually extracted from cardiac CT images for each patient. The Mann-Whitney U or chi-square test was applied to select the most significant predictors. Six machine learning algorithms including logistic regression, Naive Bayes, random forest (RF), linear discriminant analysis, support vector machine, and K-nearest neighbor were used for modeling. These algorithms were independently trained on 100 train-validation random splits with a 3:1 ratio. Their average performance was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
resultsSeven CT morphologic parameters were selected for modeling. RF obtained the best performance, with mean AUC of 0.840 (confidence interval [CI] 0.832-0.850) and 0.787 (95% CI 0.780-0.794); sensitivity of 0.815 (95% CI 0.797-0.833) and 0.778 (95% CI 0.767-0.788), specificity of 0.766 (95% CI 0.748-0.785) and 0.746 (95% CI 0.735-0.757); and accuracy of 0.782 (95% CI 0.771-0.793) and 0.756 (95% CI 0.748-0.764) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively.
conclusionsThe CT-based RF model demonstrates a good performance in the prediction of mPAP, which may reduce the need for right heart catheterization in post-Glenn shunt patients with suspected mPAP > 15 mmHg. KEY POINTS: • Twenty-three candidate descriptors were manually extracted from cardiac computed tomography images, and seven of them were selected for subsequent modeling. • The random forest model presents the best predictive performance for pulmonary pressure among all methods. • The computed tomography-based machine learning model could predict post-Glenn shunt pulmonary pressure non-invasively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.