ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019
Fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for malignant gliomas: comparison with single session stereotactic radiosurgery.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is feasible for malignant glioma; however, delivering the optimal radiation dose with sufficient large-volume coverage is a major concern. We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of fractionated SRS (fSRS) versus single-session SRS (sSRS) for malignant gliomas.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 58 malignant glioma patients who underwent gamma knife SRS from January 2015 to December 2018. Forty-one underwent sSRS, and 17 underwent fSRS. Median dose for fSRS was 28 Gy (range 24-35 Gy), with a median dose of 6 Gy per fraction (range 5-7 Gy). Patients received 4 or 5 fractions on consecutive days. Median dose for sSRS was 18 Gy (range 11-25 Gy), with a median isodose of 50% (range 50-65%). Mean target volumes were 5.9 and 19.3 cc for sSRS and fSRS, respectively (p < 0.001, two-sided t test).
resultsAfter SRS, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 and 4.6 months (p = 0.58), and median overall survival (OS) was 12.7 and 12.6 months for sSRS and fSRS (p = 0.41), respectively (log-rank test). The incidence of clinically significant radiation necrosis was 20.5% (8/39) and 18.8% (3/16) for sSRS and fSRS, respectively (p = 1, Fisher's exact test).
conclusionfSRS for malignant glioma conferred local control and survival comparable with conventional sSRS. The radiation necrosis incidence was comparable between groups when a parallel biological effective dose was administered to the larger target volumes in the fSRS group. fSRS can be a better alternative to sSRS if re-irradiation is considered for large malignant gliomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.