Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31705229›Full record

ArticleClinical & experimental metastasis2020

Disparities in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of lung cancer brain metastases: a SEER-Medicare study.

Mustafa S Ascha, Kaitlyn Funk, Andrew E Sloan, Carol Kruchko, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mustafa S AschaDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Center for Clinical Investigation, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-7379
Kaitlyn FunkCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Andrew E SloanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Carol KruchkoCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, IL, USA.
Jill S Barnholtz-SloanDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2-526 Wolstein Research Bldg, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7295, USA. jsb42@case.edu.
Case Western Reserve University · USCentral Brain Tumor Registry of the United States · USCornell University · USUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

CDC HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a costly procedure used to irradiate disease tissue while sparing healthy tissue, ideally limiting the side effects of treatment. SRS is frequently used in the setting of lung cancer, which is associated with greater rates of BM, though its cost may lead to potentially inequitable use across patient populations. This study investigates potential disparities in the use of SRS to treat Medicare patients. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results cancer registry data for patients diagnosed between the years 2010 and 2012 were examined to identify lung cancer patients diagnosed with BM at the same time as their primary cancer (SBM). Medicare claims for SRS were identified; the odds of having SRS claims and hazards of mortality associated with those odds were examined with respect to various clinical and demographic characteristics. Of 74,142 Medicare-enrolled patients diagnosed with lung cancer, 9192 were diagnosed with SBM and 3259 of those patients received SRS. Adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics, males with SBM had 0.85 times the odds of SRS compared to females with SBM. Black patients and those of other race had significantly lower odds of evidence of SRS compared to WNH patients. SRS may not be delivered equitably among Medicare patients. Males and minority patients may have decreased odds of SRS and worse survival compared to female and WNH patients, respectively.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealthcare DisparitiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMedicareMinority GroupsRadiosurgeryLung cancer brain metastasesObservational studyReal-world evidenceSEER-MedicareStereotactic radiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID31705229
OpenAlexW2985985684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.