ReviewDer Orthopade2019
[Finger and shoulder injuries in rock climbing].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06410339 (Ultrasound Assessment of Anatomical Changes in the Fingers of Recreational Rock Climbers), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ultrasound Assessment of Anatomical Changes in the Fingers of Recreational Rock Climbers
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proposal of a specific classification of primary periphyseal stress injuries in adolescent rock climbers.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- Ultrasound features of a pulley strain in a sport climber: a discussion based on a case report.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Article
- Evaluation of finger cartilage composition in recreational climbers with 7 Tesla T2 mapping magnetic resonance imaging.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2023Article
- Balancing the Bar-Influence of Social Behaviour on Sport Climbing Performance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSport climbing is rapidly becoming a popular trend sport, which has resulted in a surge of climbing-specific injuries.
objectivesThe goal of this paper is to delineate the incidence of climbing-specific injuries focusing on finger and shoulder injuries. Furthermore, we aim to illustrate clinical symptoms and therapeutic strategies based on the current literature. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe incidence of climbing-specific injuries in a large patient population was recorded and diagnosis and treatment options were assessed considering the current literature.
resultsFinger and shoulder injuries are the most common entities in sport climbing. With regard to finger injuries, more than 30 different differential diagnoses were identified, with pulley injuries, tenosynovitis, epiphyseal fractures, as well as lumbrical muscle tears being of the greatest importance due to their climbing-specific nature. With regard to shoulder injuries, SLAP lesions play a particularly important role, currently representing the fifth most common diagnosis in the patient population analyzed. Further pathologies that are becoming increasingly important among sport climbers are injuries of the rotator cuff, long biceps tendon ruptures, impingement syndromes and injuries caused by shoulder dislocations (e.g. Bankart lesions).
conclusionsFinger injuries are common in sports climbing and can be challenging to diagnose and treat correctly. The number of shoulder injuries is expected to rise as new competition modalities and sub-disciplines (e.g. bouldering) increasingly stress athletes' musculoskeletal systems. An increase of degenerative injuries in long-time climbers is expected due to changes in the sport.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31705177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.