ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2020
Fosfomycin and Staphylococcus aureus: transcriptomic approach to assess effect on biofilm, and fate of unattached cells.
Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fosfomycin, Applying Known Methods and Remedies to A New Era.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Reading between the Lines: Utilizing RNA-Seq Data for Global Analysis of sRNAs in Staphylococcus aureus.mSphere · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interest has been rekindled in the old antibiotic fosfomycin, partly because of its ability to penetrate biofilm. Using a transcriptomic approach, we investigated the modifications induced by fosfomycin in sessile cells of a clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a device-associated infection. Cells still able to form biofilm after 4 h of incubation in the presence of subinhibitory concentrations of fosfomycin and cells from 24-h-old biofilm later submitted to fosfomycin had 6.77% and 9.41%, respectively, of differentially expressed genes compared with their antibiotic-free control. Fosfomycin induced mostly downregulation of genes assigned to nucleotide, amino acid and carbohydrate transport, and metabolism. Adhesins and capsular biosynthesis proteins encoding genes were downregulated in fosfomycin-grown biofilm, whereas the murein hydrolase regulator lgrA and a D-lactate dehydrogenase-encoding gene were upregulated. In fosfomycin-treated biofilm, the expression of genes encoding adhesins, the cell wall biosynthesis protein ScdA, and to a lesser extent the fosfomycin target MurA was also decreased. Unattached cells surrounding fosfomycin-grown biofilm showed greater ability to form aggregates than their counterparts obtained without fosfomycin. Reducing their global metabolism and lowering cell wall turnover would allow some S. aureus cells to grow in biofilm despite fosfomycin stress while promoting hyperadherent phenotype in the vicinity of the fosfomycin-treated biofilm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.