Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31705104›Full record

ArticleBritish dental journal2019

Might one simple question indicate a child's caries risk and guide preventive advice?

Ronnie S Levine Obe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in British dental journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronnie S Levine ObeHon. Senior Research Fellow in Child Health Academic Unit of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Paediatrics University of Leeds; Department of Oral Surgery, University of Leeds School of Dentistry, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds, LS2 9LU, UK. r.s.levine@leeds.ac.uk.
University of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

That the extraction of carious teeth is the most common reason for hospital admission of under 18-year-olds in England suggests that a reappraisal of preventive advice in primary dental care for this age-group is now urgently needed. Dental professionals working under time constraints in areas of social deprivation and high caries prevalence need a simple approach to determining caries risk and simple, acceptable preventive messages to convey to patients. The advice not to give sugar-sweetened food or drink in the hour before bedtime and especially not to put infants to bed with a feeding bottle, other than one containing just water, coupled with supervised twice daily toothbrushing with a fluoride toothpaste containing at least 1000 ppm of fluoride might be a pragmatic way of reducing the burden of caries and the need for hospital admission for a largely preventable disease.

Indexed as

Cariostatic AgentsDental CariesChildEnglandFluoridesHumansInfantToothbrushingToothpastesCariostatic AgentsFluoridesToothpastes

Identifiers

PMID31705104
OpenAlexW2984917625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.