Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31704961›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Rapid, multiplexed, whole genome and plasmid sequencing of foodborne pathogens using long-read nanopore technology.

Tonya L Taylor, Jeremy D Volkening, Eric DeJesus, Mustafa Simmons, Kiril M Dimitrov, Glenn E Tillman, David L Suarez, Claudio L Afonso

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nanopore sequencing in veterinary medicine: from concepts to clinical applications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Complete genome sequences of 17Microbiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetic relatedness and virulence potential ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rapid diagnosis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  16. Hybrid Genomic Analysis ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tonya L TaylorExotic and Emerging Avian Viral Diseases Research Unit, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 934 College Station Road, Athens, GA, USA.
Jeremy D VolkeningBASE2BIO, Oshkosh, WI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8892-7155
Eric DeJesusOffice of Public Health Services, Food Safety and Inspection Services, USDA, 950 College Station Road, Athens, GA, USA.
Mustafa SimmonsOffice of Public Health Services, Food Safety and Inspection Services, USDA, 950 College Station Road, Athens, GA, USA.
Kiril M DimitrovExotic and Emerging Avian Viral Diseases Research Unit, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 934 College Station Road, Athens, GA, USA.
Glenn E TillmanOffice of Public Health Services, Food Safety and Inspection Services, USDA, 950 College Station Road, Athens, GA, USA.
David L SuarezExotic and Emerging Avian Viral Diseases Research Unit, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 934 College Station Road, Athens, GA, USA.
Claudio L AfonsoExotic and Emerging Avian Viral Diseases Research Unit, Southeast Poultry Research Laboratory, US National Poultry Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, 934 College Station Road, Athens, GA, USA. cafonso@uga.edu.
Agricultural Research Service · USFood Safety and Inspection Service · USOshkosh (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

U.S. public health agencies have employed next-generation sequencing (NGS) as a tool to quickly identify foodborne pathogens during outbreaks. Although established short-read NGS technologies are known to provide highly accurate data, long-read sequencing is still needed to resolve highly-repetitive genomic regions and genomic arrangement, and to close the sequences of bacterial chromosomes and plasmids. Here, we report the use of long-read nanopore sequencing to simultaneously sequence the entire chromosome and plasmid of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Bareilly and Escherichia coli O157:H7. We developed a rapid and random sequencing approach coupled with de novo genome assembly within a customized data analysis workflow that uses publicly-available tools. In sequencing runs as short as four hours, using the MinION instrument, we obtained full-length genomes with an average identity of 99.87% for Salmonella Bareilly and 99.89% for E. coli in comparison to the respective MiSeq references. These nanopore-only assemblies provided readily available information on serotype, virulence factors, and antimicrobial resistance genes. We also demonstrate the potential of nanopore sequencing assemblies for rapid preliminary phylogenetic inference. Nanopore sequencing provides additional advantages as very low capital investment and footprint, and shorter (10 hours library preparation and sequencing) turnaround time compared to other NGS technologies.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialAnimalsBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliFoodborne DiseasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingNanopore SequencingPlasmidsSalmonellaSequence Analysis, DNAVirulence FactorsWhole Genome SequencingBacterial ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID31704961
PMCPMC6841976
OpenAlexW2989284056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.