Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31704773›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

Unfolding or aggregation, that is the question.

Marcel Bolten, Jonathan P Bernardini, Thibault Mayor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcel BoltenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5T 1Z4, Canada.
Jonathan P BernardiniDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5T 1Z4, Canada.
Thibault MayorDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V5T 1Z4, Canada mayor@mail.ubc.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular processes accompanying protein aggregation are diverse and entangled, making it difficult to investigate the underlying molecular processes in a time-resolved way. Gottlieb, Thompson, and colleagues address this shortcoming using a chemical biology approach to monitor ubiquitination within the first 10 min after the initiation of protein aggregation. Intriguingly, unfolding rather than aggregation seems to trigger the observed events. This work might provide a method to answer open questions regarding the regulation of the proteostasis network upon protein misfolding.

Indexed as

Protein AggregatesHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProteinsProtein UnfoldingProteostasisUbiquitinationADRM1 protein, humanIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein AggregatesProteins

Identifiers

PMID31704773
PMCPMC6851313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.