Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31704292›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2020

Nature abhors a paywall: How open science can realize the potential of naturalistic stimuli.

Elizabeth DuPre, Michael Hanke, Jean-Baptiste Poline

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Naturalistic Stimuli in Affective Neuroimaging: A Review.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth DuPreMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Canada. Electronic address: elizabeth.dupre@mail.mcgill.ca.
Michael HankeInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain & Behaviour (INM-7), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jean-Baptiste PolineMontreal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Canada.

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Large-scale meta-analysis of functional MRI dataR01MH096906 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Alejandro De La Vega · 2012 to 2026
$7.9M
Exposing the Deep Content of the Publication: Knowledge Extraction for Neuroimaging in Child PsychiatryR01MH083320 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FRAZIER, JEAN A, KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON · 2009 to 2020
$6.3M
NeuroScout: A cloud-based platform for flexible re-analysis of naturalistic fMRI datasetsR01MH109682 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DE LA VEGA, ALEJANDRO · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
OPERATION, SUPPORT AND STRATEGIC ENHANCEMENT OF THE NEUROSCIENCE INFORMATION FRAMEWORKU24DA039832 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GRETHE, JEFFREY S., MARTONE, MARYANN E · 2015 to 2016
$2.0M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA039832NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083320NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096906NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH109682
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturalistic stimuli show significant potential to inform behavioral, cognitive, and clinical neuroscience. To date, this impact is still limited by the relative inaccessibility of both generated neuroimaging data as well as the supporting naturalistic stimuli. In this perspective, we highlight currently available naturalistic datasets and technical solutions such as DataLad that continue to advance our ability to share this data. We also review scientific and sociological challenges in selecting naturalistic stimuli for reproducible research. Overall, we encourage researchers to share their naturalistic datasets to the full extent possible under local copyright law.

Indexed as

Information DisseminationDatabases, FactualHumansNeurosciencesPublic SectorData sharingNaturalistic stimuliOpen science

Identifiers

PMID31704292
PMCPMC7198323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.