Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31704271›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2020

Differences in mechanisms underlying reinstatement of cigarette smoke extract- and nicotine-seeking behavior in rats.

Sarah J Cross, Daisy D Reynaga, Michelle Cano, James D Belluzzi, Nurulain T Zaveri, Frances M Leslie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unique, long-term effects of nicotine on adolescent brain.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah J CrossDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA. Electronic address: crosssj@uci.edu.
Daisy D ReynagaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Michelle CanoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
James D BelluzziDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Nurulain T ZaveriAstraea Therapeutics, Mountain View, CA, USA.
Frances M LeslieDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

Funding

The role of non-nicotine tobacco smoke constituents in withdrawal and cravingR01DA040440 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LESLIE, FRANCES M. · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive research, current therapies for smoking cessation are largely ineffective at maintaining abstinence for more than a year. Whereas most preclinical studies use nicotine alone, the goal of the present study was to evaluate whether inclusion of non-nicotine tobacco constituents provides better face validity for the development of new pharmacological therapies for smoking cessation. Here, we trained adult male rats to self-administer nicotine alone or cigarette smoke extract (CSE), which contains nicotine and other aqueous constituents of cigarette smoke. After stable self-administration behavior was established, animals underwent extinction training followed by drug and cue primed reinstatement testing. We show that animals that self-administered CSE had significant reinstatement in all drug and drug + cue stimulus conditions whereas animals that self-administered nicotine only showed significant reinstatement in the drug + cue conditions. AT-1001, an α3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) functional antagonist, attenuated drug + cue-primed reinstatement of both CSE- and nicotine-seeking behavior. However, AT-1001 was less potent in blocking drug-primed reinstatement in animals that had self-administered CSE than in those that had self-administered nicotine alone. This was the case even when nicotine was used to prime reinstatement in animals that had self-administered CSE, suggesting that prior CSE exposure had altered the functional role of α3β4-containing nAChRs in drug-seeking behavior. These findings confirm the importance of non-nicotine tobacco constituents and α3β4* nAChRs in cue- and nicotine-primed craving. They also suggest that tests using CSE may be more valid models to study tobacco dependence than use of nicotine alone.

Indexed as

CuesSmokeAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDisease Models, AnimalDrug-Seeking BehaviorExtinction, PsychologicalMaleNicotineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic AntagonistsOligopeptidesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReceptors, NicotinicSelf Administrationlarazotide acetateNicotineNicotinic AgonistsNicotinic Antagonistsnicotinic receptor alpha3beta4OligopeptidesReceptors, NicotinicSmokeCigarette smoke constituentsCue reinstatementDrug-primed reinstatementNicotineTobaccoα3β4 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors

Identifiers

PMID31704271
PMCPMC7034132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.