ReviewTrends in neurosciences2019
Accumulators, Neurons, and Response Time.
Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Visual Simulation Is Supported by Sequential Monitoring in the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2026Article
- Frontocentral Neural Dynamics Reflect Decisions about When to Act.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- No Central Executive? Decision Formation Through Multi-Area Population Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Review
- Time-adaptive modulation of evidence evaluation in rat posterior parietal cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Factorial variation of saccade vigor with dual decision processes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Dissociate triggering of conjunctive and disjunctive eye movements.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-decision time: The Higgs Boson of decision.Psychological review · 2025Article
- In simple but challenging search tasks, most errors are stochastic.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- The gated cascade diffusion model: An integrated theory of decision making, motor preparation, and motor execution.Psychological review · 2024Article
- Interpersonal alignment of neural evidence accumulation to social exchange of confidence.eLife · 2023Article
- An Accumulating Neural Signal Underlying Binocular Rivalry Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Impact of aversive affect on neural mechanisms of categorization decisions.Brain and behavior · 2023Article
- Neural mechanisms for executive control of speed-accuracy trade-off.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Resilience of FEF neuronal saccade code to V4 perturbations.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Feedforward attentional selection in sensory cortex.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Salience by competitive and recurrent interactions: Bridging neural spiking and computation in visual attention.Psychological review · 2022Article
- Current foveal inspection and previous peripheral preview influence subsequent eye movement decisions.iScience · 2022Article
- Hasty sensorimotor decisions rely on an overlap of broad and selective changes in motor activity.PLoS biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The marriage of cognitive neurophysiology and mathematical psychology to understand decision-making has been exceptionally productive. This interdisciplinary area is based on the proposition that particular neurons or circuits instantiate the accumulation of evidence specified by mathematical models of sequential sampling and stochastic accumulation. This linking proposition has earned widespread endorsement. Here, a brief survey of the history of the proposition precedes a review of multiple conundrums and paradoxes concerning the accuracy, precision, and transparency of that linking proposition. Correctly establishing how abstract models of decision-making are instantiated by particular neural circuits would represent a remarkable accomplishment in mapping mind to brain. Failing would reveal challenging limits for cognitive neuroscience. This is such a vigorous area of research because so much is at stake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.