ArticleBMC medical education2019
To examine the associations between medical students' conceptions of learning, strategies to learning, and learning outcome in a medical humanities course.
Article in BMC medical education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative metabolomics and network pharmacology reveal the antifibrotic mechanisms of Gurigumu-13 in a rat model of hepatic fibrosis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among medical students toward depression management: a cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- How do medical students learn conceptual knowledge? High-, moderate- and low-utility learning techniques and perceived learning difficulties.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Medical Students' Online Learning Perceptions, Online Learning Readiness, and Learning Outcomes during COVID-19: The Moderating Role of Teacher's Readiness to Teach Online.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Creating Alignment: How the Humanities Can Help Heal Physicians and Patients.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBy learning medical humanities, medical students are expected to shift from handling the diseases only to seeing a whole sick person. Therefore, understanding medical students' learning process and outcomes of medical humanities becomes an essential issue of medical education. Few studies have been conducted to explore factors surrounding medical students' learning process and outcomes of medical humanities. The objectives were: (1) to investigate the relationships between medical students' conceptions of learning and strategies to learning; and (2) to examine the relationships between students' strategies to learning and learning outcomes for medical humanities.
methodsWe used the modified Approaches to Learning Medicine (mALM) questionnaire and Conceptions of Learning Medicine (COLM) questionnaire to measure the medical students' strategies to learning and conceptions of learning respectively. The learning outcome of medical humanities was measured using students' weighted grade in a medical humanities course. The confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to validate the COLM and mALM questionnaires, in which construct validity and reliability were assessed. Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationships among the factors of COLM, mALM, and the weighted grade. Path analysis using structural equation modeling technique (SEM) was employed to estimate the structural relationships among the COLM, mALM, and the weighted grade.
resultsTwo hundred and seventy-five first-year medical students consented to participate in this study. The participants adopting surface strategies to learning were more likely to have unsatisfactory learning outcome (β = - 0.14, p = .04). The basic-level conception of "Preparing for Testing" was negatively (β = - 0.19, p < .01) associated with deep strategies of learning, and positively (β = 0.48, p < .01) associated with surface strategies of learning (β = 0.50, p < .01). The basic-level conception of "Skills Acquisition" was positively associated with deep strategies of learning (β = 0.23, p < .01).
conclusionMedical educators should wisely employ teaching strategies to increase students' engagement with deep and self-directed learning strategies, and to avoid using surface learning strategies in the medical humanities course in order to achieve better learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.