Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703665›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Social-ecological correlates of accelerometer-measured occupational sitting among Japanese desk-based workers.

Satoshi Kurita, Ai Shibata, Kaori Ishii, Mohammad Javad Koohsari, Koichiro Oka

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Satoshi KuritaDepartment of Preventive Gerontology, Center for Gerontology and Social Science, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan. kuritoshi@ncgg.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5467-3268
Ai ShibataFaculty Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Kaori IshiiFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Mohammad Javad KoohsariFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.
Koichiro OkaFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, Japan.

Funding

Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology S1511017Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17716Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K10986Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K17995Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 26242070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the main targets for reducing workplace sedentary behavior have been clarified, only a few studies have examined the association between social-ecological factors and workplace sedentary behavior for effective intervention. The present study aimed to examine the social-ecological factors of workplace sedentary behavior among Japanese sedentary workers.

methodsParticipants were recruited via a cross-sectional mail survey targeting randomly sampled 6000 middle-aged people dwelling in Matsuyama-city and Koto-ku in Japan. Participants answered a questionnaire on social-ecological factors, recorded their work time in a diary, and wore a triaxial accelerometer during waking time for 7 consecutive days. Workplace sedentary behavior was measured using accelerometer and was referred to as the work time in the recorded diary. Full-time workers who had mainly sitting work and valid accelerometer data were included in the analysis. Workplace sedentary variables were sedentary breaks per sedentary hour, sedentary time, and ≥ 30 min bouts of sedentary time. The associations between each sedentary variable and social-ecological factors were explored by conducting three multiple linear regression analyses adjusting for sociodemographic and health-related factors.

resultsA total of 227 participants (133 men, mean age 49.9 ± 6.9 years) were included in the analysis. In the overall sample, "typically seeing work colleagues take sedentary breaks" was significantly associated with more sedentary breaks (B [95% confidence interval {CI}=1.40 [0.07 to 2.73]) and shorter ≥30-min bouts of sedentary time (B [95% CI] = -7.08 [-13.75 to -0.40]). "I am motivated to take sedentary breaks" had an unfavorable association with less sedentary breaks (B [95% CI] = -1.36 [-2.61 to -0.12]) and longer sedentary time (B [95% CI] = 4.15 [0.29 to 8.00]). In male workers, "Too stressed to take sedentary breaks" was significantly associated with less sedentary breaks (B [95% CI] = -5.6 [-9.17 to -2.02]).

conclusionsSeeing work colleagues take sedentary breaks may be important for reducing workplace sedentary behavior. Those who are more sedentary are motivated to take sedentary breaks. Male workers who feel the need to take sedentary breaks at work are more sedentary.

Indexed as

Sitting PositionSocial EnvironmentAccelerometryAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedMotivationSedentary BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkWorkplaceDeterminantsEnvironmentSedentary behaviorWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID31703665
PMCPMC6842144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.