Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703661›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Estimating the public health impact of a national guideline on cervical cancer screening: an audit study of a program in Campinas, Brazil.

Diama Bhadra Vale, Talita Lourenço Menin, Joana Froes Bragança, Julio Cesar Teixeira, Lucas Almeida Cavalcante, Luiz Carlos Zeferino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Cervical Cancer Screening with DNA-HPV Testing and Precancerous Lesions Detection: A Brazilian Population-based Demonstration Study.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Diama Bhadra ValeDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, CEP 13083-790, Brazil. dvale@unicamp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2423-0225
Talita Lourenço MeninDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, CEP 13083-790, Brazil.
Joana Froes BragançaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, CEP 13083-790, Brazil.
Julio Cesar TeixeiraDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, CEP 13083-790, Brazil.
Lucas Almeida CavalcanteDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, CEP 13083-790, Brazil.
Luiz Carlos ZeferinoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Rua Alexander Fleming 101, Campinas, CEP 13083-790, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA Brazilian guideline on cervical cancer screening was released in 2011. The objective was to verify changes in screening indicators around this period.

methodsAn audit study which sample was all screening tests performed by the public health system of Campinas city from 2010 to 2016. Variables were absolute tests numbers, excess tests, intervals and results, by age. For trend analysis was used Cochran-Armitage × 2 and linear regression.

resultsWere carried out 62,925 tests in 2010 and 43,523 tests in 2016, a tendency at a reduction (P = 0.001). Excess tests were higher than 50% over the years, with a tendency at a reduction (P < 0.001). Tests performed on women under 25 ranged from 20.2 to 15.4% in the period (P < 0.001), while in the 25-64 years age-group, it ranged from 75.1 to 80.2% (P < 0.001). In 2010 the most frequent interval was annual (47.5%) and in 2016 biennial (34.7%). There was a tendency at a reduction in the proportion of tests performed at the first time and those with an annual interval (P < 0.001), and also a tendency at an increase in tests with intervals equal to or greater than biannual (P < 0.001). We observed a tendency at a reduction in LSIL and HSIL-CIN2 results (P = 0.04 and P = 0.001, respectively), and a tendency at an increase in HSIL-CIN3 result (P = 0.02).

conclusionThe proportion of cervical cancer screening tests performed out of the recommendation showed a significant reduction in the period. This indicates a tendency to align cervical cancer screening in Campinas with the standards recommended.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicAdultBrazilCommission on Professional and Hospital ActivitiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationPublic HealthUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31703661
PMCPMC6842174
OpenAlexW2983177282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.