ReviewBMC public health2019
A research tool for measuring non-participation of older people in research on digital health.
Review in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Testing the Recruitment Frequency, Implementation Fidelity, and Feasibility of Outcomes of the Heart Failure Activity Coach Study (HEALTHY): Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- Factors Influencing Response Rates in National Internet-Based Questionnaires: Analysis of a Large National Survey.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Perspectives on digital therapeutic prescribing: a qualitative study among German psychological psychotherapists.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Digital and traditional recruitment strategies and participation patterns in the multicenter Healthy Brain Ageing study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Improving Recruitment Through Social Media and Web-Based Advertising to Evaluate the Genetic Risk and Long-Term Complications in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Community-Based Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Plugged-in: a Canadian survey of technology ownership, access, use, and attitudes among emergency department patients.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Nonparticipation in a Digital Health Intervention Study Among Older Adults: Uneven Involvement, Biased Outcomes, and the Effect of Weighting.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
- Participation and engagement in online cognitive testing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Digital exclusion and cognitive impairment in older people: findings from five longitudinal studies.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Digital Health Experience for Patients in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- [Developments in the digitalization of public health since 2020 : Examples from the Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health Bremen].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2024Review
- Understanding the use of CATI and web-based data collection methods during the pandemic among digitally challenged groups at FQHCs: data from theFrontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- The participation of hard-to-reach older people in the research and development process of health technologies from the perspective of multipliers-A qualitative analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- [Motivational Reasons and Perceptions about Future Participation of Older People in the Research and Development Process of Health Technologies: a Mixed Methods Study].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023Article
- Preferences and willingness-to-pay for a blood pressure telemonitoring program using a discrete choice experiment.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- The Geras virtual frailty rehabilitation program to build resilience in older adults with frailty during COVID-19: a randomized feasibility trial.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2023Article
- Available tools to evaluate digital health literacy and engagement with eHealth resources: A scoping review.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Behavioral Patterns of Supply and Demand Sides of Health Services for the Elderly in Sustainable Digital Transformation: A Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Food safety behavioural changes among the population in Sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 first wave.Heliyon · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare services are being increasingly digitalised in European countries. However, in studies evaluating digital health technology, some people are less likely to participate than others, e.g. those who are older, those with a lower level of education and those with poorer digital skills. Such non-participation in research - deriving from the processes of non-recruitment of targeted individuals and self-selection - can be a driver of old-age exclusion from new digital health technologies. We aim to introduce, discuss and test an instrument to measure non-participation in digital health studies, in particular, the process of self-selection.
methodsBased on a review of the relevant literature, we designed an instrument - the NPART survey questionnaire - for the analysis of self-selection, covering five thematic areas: socioeconomic factors, self-rated health and subjective overall quality of life, social participation, time resources, and digital skills and use of technology. The instrument was piloted on 70 older study persons in Sweden, approached during the recruitment process for a trial study.
resultsResults indicated that participants, as compared to decliners, were on average slightly younger and more educated, and reported better memory, higher social participation, and higher familiarity with and greater use of digital technologies. Overall, the survey questionnaire was able to discriminate between participants and decliners on the key aspects investigated, along the lines of the relevant literature.
conclusionsThe NPART survey questionnaire can be applied to characterise non-participation in digital health research, in particular, the process of self-selection. It helps to identify underrepresented groups and their needs. Data generated from such an investigation, combined with hospital registry data on non-recruitment, allows for the implementation of improved sampling strategies, e.g. focused recruitment of underrepresented groups, and for the post hoc adjustment of results generated from biased samples, e.g. weighting procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.