Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703555›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2019

Hooked on you: shape of attachment structures in cymothoid isopods reflects parasitic strategy.

Charles Baillie, Rachel L Welicky, Kerry A Hadfield, Nico J Smit, Stefano Mariani, Robin M D Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Occurrence of infestation with the isopod,Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charles BaillieSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK. c.j.p.baillie@salford.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8643-4368
Rachel L WelickySchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, 1122 NE Boat St, Seattle, 98105, USA.
Kerry A HadfieldWater Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, 2531, South Africa.
Nico J SmitWater Research Group, Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, 2531, South Africa.
Stefano MarianiSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.
Robin M D BeckSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, L3 3AF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParasite attachment structures are critical traits that influence effective host exploitation and survival. Morphology of attachment structures can reinforce host specificity and niche specialisation, or even enable host switching. Therefore, it is important to understand the determinants of variation in attachment structures. Cymothoid isopods are striking ectoparasites of fishes that include the infamous 'tongue-biters.' They are known to parasitise hosts in one of four qualitatively distinct anatomical regions. Here, we quantify variation in cymothoid attachment structures - hook-like appendages called dactyli - and test whether differences in dactylus shape are correlated with parasite mode (where they attach), allometry, or both, using multivariate ordinary least squares regression. We also assess the influence of shared ancestry on shape using a molecular phylogeny to weight our models using phylogenetic generalised least squares regression.

resultsWe find clear differences in shape between externally-attaching and internally-attaching cymothoids but also between anterior and posterior dactyli across various species with the same attachment mode. Allometric effects are significant for anterior but not posterior dactyli. Mouth-attaching species show greater shape variability than gill- and mouth-attaching species. We find no evidence that there are clade-specific patterns of association between parasite mode and dactylus shape.

conclusionsParasite mode appears to be the main driver of attachment morphology. This likely reflects several components of parasite ecology including feeding and functional demands of attachment in different microhabitats. Geometric morphometric approaches to the quantification of shape variation of simple structures is an effective tool that provides new insights into the evolvability of parasite attachment.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsAnimalsEctoparasitic InfestationsFemaleFish DiseasesFishesGillsIsopodaMaleMouthPhylogenyAttachmentConvergenceIsopodParasiteTongue-biters

Identifiers

PMID31703555
PMCPMC6839256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.