ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
MiPepid: MicroPeptide identification tool using machine learning.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- A microprotein atlas of the human frontal cortex in Alzheimer's disease.Nature aging · 2026Article
- Computational identification and characterization of noncoding RNA-encoded peptides: tools, databases, and in silico strategies.Amino acids · 2026Review
- Microproteins in Human Physiology and Pathology.Biochemistry · 2026Review
- Revisiting noncoding RNAs: emerging coding functions and their impact on skeletal muscle development.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Identification of Potentially Coding Small ORFs in Plant Transcriptomes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- The 'non-conventional' peptidome: A new layer in plant regulatory mechanisms.Plant communications · 2025Review
- Micropeptides in the oncological dark matter: decoding their roles in tumor progression and therapy resistance.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Investigating the role of long non-coding RNA in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Pharmaceutical perspectives on oligonucleotide therapeutics and delivery systems.Pharmacological reviews · 2025Review
- Popcorn: prediction of short coding and noncoding genomic sequences in prokaryotes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Current Perspectives on Functional Involvement of Micropeptides in Virus-Host Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Small open reading frame-encoded microproteins in cancer: identification, biological functions and clinical significance.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- lncRNA-Encoded Small Peptide Promotes Viral Infection.Molecular plant pathology · 2025Article
- Emerging role of endogenous peptides encoded by non-coding RNAs in cancer biology.Non-coding RNA research · 2025Review
- SORFPP: Enhancing rich sequence-driven information to identify SEPs based on fused framework on validation datasets.PloS one · 2025Article
- An overview of computational methods for gene prediction in eukaryotes: strengths, limitations, and future directions.Bioinformatics advances · 2025Review
- Recent Advances in Peptide Drug Discovery: Novel Strategies and Targeted Protein Degradation.Pharmaceutics · 2024Review
- Small ORFs, Big Insights:Cells · 2024Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMicropeptides are small proteins with length < = 100 amino acids. Short open reading frames that could produces micropeptides were traditionally ignored due to technical difficulties, as few small peptides had been experimentally confirmed. In the past decade, a growing number of micropeptides have been shown to play significant roles in vital biological activities. Despite the increased amount of data, we still lack bioinformatics tools for specifically identifying micropeptides from DNA sequences. Indeed, most existing tools for classifying coding and noncoding ORFs were built on datasets in which "normal-sized" proteins were considered to be positives and short ORFs were generally considered to be noncoding. Since the functional and biophysical constraints on small peptides are likely to be different from those on "normal" proteins, methods for predicting short translated ORFs must be trained independently from those for longer proteins.
resultsIn this study, we have developed MiPepid, a machine-learning tool specifically for the identification of micropeptides. We trained MiPepid using carefully cleaned data from existing databases and used logistic regression with 4-mer features. With only the sequence information of an ORF, MiPepid is able to predict whether it encodes a micropeptide with 96% accuracy on a blind dataset of high-confidence micropeptides, and to correctly classify newly discovered micropeptides not included in either the training or the blind test data. Compared with state-of-the-art coding potential prediction methods, MiPepid performs exceptionally well, as other methods incorrectly classify most bona fide micropeptides as noncoding. MiPepid is alignment-free and runs sufficiently fast for genome-scale analyses. It is easy to use and is available at https://github.com/MindAI/MiPepid.
conclusionsMiPepid was developed to specifically predict micropeptides, a category of proteins with increasing significance, from DNA sequences. It shows evident advantages over existing coding potential prediction methods on micropeptide identification. It is ready to use and runs fast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.