ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
Optimal sequencing depth design for whole genome re-sequencing in pigs.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- A more complete picture: capturing single nucleotide variant diversity in extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producingMicrobial genomics · 2026Article
- Genome-wide association study reveals novel loci associated with body size and carcass yields in Shaoxing ducks.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- Whole-genome variant of 220 Tibetan sheep from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Benchmarking genome assemblers for four bacterial models based on contiguity, correctness, and completeness.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Genome assembly and whole-genome resequencing study of Butuo Black sheep (Ovis aries).Scientific data · 2025Article
- Whole Genome Resequencing of 205 Avocado Trees Unveils the Genomic Patterns of Racial Divergence in the Americas.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Benchmarking of low coverage sequencing workflows for precision genotyping in eggplant.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Leveraging Whole-Genome Resequencing to Uncover Genetic Diversity and Promote Conservation Strategies for Ruminants in Asia.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Advances in Whole Genome Sequencing: Methods, Tools, and Applications in Population Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Genomic characterisation of endangered Landim pigs reveals distinctive features and immune-related selection.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Optimization of Whole-Genome Resequencing Depth for High-Throughput SNP Genotyping inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Discover QTLs for the level of blood components in Shaoxing duck using GWAS and haplotype sharing analysis.Animal biotechnology · 2024Article
- Whole-genome de novo sequencing reveals genomic variants associated with differences of sex development in SRY negative pigs.Biology of sex differences · 2024Article
- Whole genome sequences of 70 indigenous Ethiopian cattle.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Article
- Existing and emerging biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: relevance in staging, determination of minimal residual disease, and monitoring treatment response: a narrative review.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Review
- Whole-genome resource sequences of 57 indigenous Ethiopian goats.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Human complex mixture analysis by "FD Multi-SNP Mixture Kit".Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Review
- Genomic adaptation to extreme climate conditions in beef cattle as a consequence of cross-breeding program.BMC genomics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs whole-genome sequencing is becoming a routine technique, it is important to identify a cost-effective depth of sequencing for such studies. However, the relationship between sequencing depth and biological results from the aspects of whole-genome coverage, variant discovery power and the quality of variants is unclear, especially in pigs. We sequenced the genomes of three Yorkshire boars at an approximately 20X depth on the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform and downloaded whole-genome sequencing data for three Duroc and three Landrace pigs with an approximately 20X depth for each individual. Then, we downsampled the deep genome data by extracting twelve different proportions of 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8 and 0.9 paired reads from the original bam files to mimic the sequence data of the same individuals at sequencing depths of 1.09X, 2.18X, 3.26X, 4.35X, 6.53X, 8.70X, 10.88X, 13.05X, 15.22X, 17.40X, 19.57X and 21.75X to evaluate the influence of genome coverage, the variant discovery rate and genotyping accuracy as a function of sequencing depth. In addition, SNP chip data for Yorkshire pigs were used as a validation for the comparison of single-sample calling and multisample calling algorithms.
resultsOur results indicated that 10X is an ideal practical depth for achieving plateau coverage and discovering accurate variants, which achieved greater than 99% genome coverage. The number of false-positive variants was increased dramatically at a depth of less than 4X, which covered 95% of the whole genome. In addition, the comparison of multi- and single-sample calling showed that multisample calling was more sensitive than single-sample calling, especially at lower depths. The number of variants discovered under multisample calling was 13-fold and 2-fold higher than that under single-sample calling at 1X and 22X, respectively. A large difference was observed when the depth was less than 4.38X. However, more false-positive variants were detected under multisample calling.
conclusionsOur research will inform important study design decisions regarding whole-genome sequencing depth. Our results will be helpful for choosing the appropriate depth to achieve the same power for studies performed under limited budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.