Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703441›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Functional Dissection of the Chickpea (

Kaliamoorthy Sivasakthi, Edward Marques, Ng'andwe Kalungwana, Noelia Carrasquilla-Garcia, Peter L Chang, Emily M Bergmann, Erika Bueno, Matilde Cordeiro, Syed Gul A S Sani, Sripada M Udupa and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Chickpea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Homolog of PeaGenes · 2023
    Article
  6. Safflower (PeerJ · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Legume Genetics and Biology: From Mendel's Pea to Legume Genomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kaliamoorthy SivasakthiInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, India.
Edward MarquesDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, and Gund Institute for the Environment, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3208-0784
Ng'andwe KalungwanaSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Noelia Carrasquilla-GarciaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Peter L ChangDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7676-7708
Emily M BergmannDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Erika BuenoDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, and Gund Institute for the Environment, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Matilde CordeiroDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Syed Gul A S SaniDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Sripada M UdupaInternational Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), P.O.Box 6299, Rue Hafiane Cherkaoui, 10112 Rabat, Morocco.
Irshad A RatherDivision of Genetics & Plant Breeding, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology (SKUAST), Sopore 193 201, India.
Reyazul Rouf MirDivision of Genetics & Plant Breeding, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology (SKUAST), Sopore 193 201, India.
Vincent VadezInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, India.
George J VandemarkGrain Legume Genetics and Physiology Research, USDA-ARS, and, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA.
Pooran M GaurInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7086-5873
Douglas R CookDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Christine BoeschSchool of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Eric J B von WettbergDepartment of Plant and Soil Science, University of Vermont, and Gund Institute for the Environment, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2724-0317
Jana KholovaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru 502 324, India.
R Varma PenmetsaDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8783-6334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"Stay-green" crop phenotypes have been shown to impact drought tolerance and nutritional content of several crops. We aimed to genetically describe and functionally dissect the particular stay-green phenomenon found in chickpeas with a green cotyledon color of mature dry seed and investigate its potential use for improvement of chickpea environmental adaptations and nutritional value. We examined 40 stay-green accessions and a set of 29 BC2F4-5 stay-green introgression lines using a stay-green donor parent ICC 16340 and two Indian elite cultivars (KAK2, JGK1) as recurrent parents. Genetic studies of segregating populations indicated that the green cotyledon trait is controlled by a single recessive gene that is invariantly associated with the delayed degreening (extended chlorophyll retention). We found that the chickpea ortholog of Mendel's I locus of garden pea, encoding a SGR protein as very likely to underlie the persistently green cotyledon color phenotype of chickpea. Further sequence characterization of this chickpea ortholog CaStGR1 (CaStGR1, for carietinum stay-green gene 1) revealed the presence of five different molecular variants (alleles), each of which is likely a loss-of-function of the chickpea protein (CaStGR1) involved in chlorophyll catabolism. We tested the wild type and green cotyledon lines for components of adaptations to dry environments and traits linked to agronomic performance in different experimental systems and different levels of water availability. We found that the plant processes linked to disrupted CaStGR1 gene did not functionality affect transpiration efficiency or water usage. Photosynthetic pigments in grains, including provitaminogenic carotenoids important for human nutrition, were 2-3-fold higher in the stay-green type. Agronomic performance did not appear to be correlated with the presence/absence of the stay-green allele. We conclude that allelic variation in chickpea CaStGR1 does not compromise traits linked to environmental adaptation and agronomic performance, and is a promising genetic technology for biofortification of provitaminogenic carotenoids in chickpea.

Indexed as

CicerCotyledonCrop ProductionGenetic VariationPhenotypeCarotenoidsPhotosynthesisPigmentationCarotenoidsbiofortificationcarotenoidschickpeaCicer arietinumcosmetic stay-greengreen cotyledonMendel’s I genepro-vitamin A

Identifiers

PMID31703441
PMCPMC6888616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.