Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703364›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2019

A Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Method for Hypertension Outcomes Based on Medical Data.

Wenbing Chang, Yinglai Liu, Yiyong Xiao, Xinglong Yuan, Xingxing Xu, Siyue Zhang, Shenghan Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Hematoma expansion prediction based on SMOTE and XGBoost algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenbing ChangSchool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191 China.
Yinglai LiuSchool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191 China.ORCID 0000-0001-5965-9588
Yiyong XiaoSchool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191 China.ORCID 0000-0001-5879-8906
Xinglong YuanSchool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191 China.
Xingxing XuSchool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191 China.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-0284
Siyue ZhangSchool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191 China.ORCID 0000-0002-3033-8892
Shenghan ZhouSchool of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191 China.ORCID 0000-0001-7979-4912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The outcomes of hypertension refer to the death or serious complications (such as myocardial infarction or stroke) that may occur in patients with hypertension. The outcomes of hypertension are very concerning for patients and doctors, and are ideally avoided. However, there is no satisfactory method for predicting the outcomes of hypertension. Therefore, this paper proposes a prediction method for outcomes based on physical examination indicators of hypertension patients. In this work, we divide the patients' outcome prediction into two steps. The first step is to extract the key features from the patients' many physical examination indicators. The second step is to use the key features extracted from the first step to predict the patients' outcomes. To this end, we propose a model combining recursive feature elimination with a cross-validation method and classification algorithm. In the first step, we use the recursive feature elimination algorithm to rank the importance of all features, and then extract the optimal features subset using cross-validation. In the second step, we use four classification algorithms (support vector machine (SVM), C4.5 decision tree, random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)) to accurately predict patient outcomes by using their optimal features subset. The selected model prediction performance evaluation metrics are accuracy, F1 measure, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve. The 10-fold cross-validation shows that C4.5, RF, and XGBoost can achieve very good prediction results with a small number of features, and the classifier after recursive feature elimination with cross-validation feature selection has better prediction performance. Among the four classifiers, XGBoost has the best prediction performance, and its accuracy, F1, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values are 94.36%, 0.875, and 0.927, respectively, using the optimal features subset. This article's prediction of hypertension outcomes contributes to the in-depth study of hypertension complications and has strong practical significance.

Indexed as

classification algorithmfeature selectionhypertension outcomespredictionrecursive feature eliminationXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID31703364
PMCPMC6963807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.