ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2019
A Machine-Learning-Based Prediction Method for Hypertension Outcomes Based on Medical Data.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relationship between sublingual varices and hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Enhancing Model Generalizability in Medical Artificial Intelligence: Systematic Comparison of Categorical Encoding and Sampling Techniques for Imbalanced Data.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning integration for predicting renal function outcomes in living donor kidney transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Machine-Learning-Based Prediction of Hypertension and Its Risk Factors Among Adults in the Northern Region of Bangladesh.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Guided System for Therapeutic Decision-Making in Intra-Arterial Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Enhancing Hypertension Risk Diagnosis Using a Hybrid Machine Learning Framework: Leveraging Body Composition Data.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- Article
- Using a Machine Learning Approach to Predict Snakebite Envenoming Outcomes Among Patients Attending the Snakebite Treatment and Research Hospital in Kaltungo, Northeastern Nigeria.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity development and treatment need with machine learning models.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Identifying determinants and predicting cesarean section delivery among Bangladeshi women using machine learning: Insight from BDHS 2022 Data.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Predicting hypertension and identifying most important factors among married women in Bangladesh using machine learning approach.PloS one · 2025Article
- A machine learning tool for early identification of celiac disease autoimmunity.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- When Raw Data Prevails: Are Large Language Model Embeddings Effective in Numerical Data Representation for Medical Machine Learning Applications?Findings of ACL. EMNLP. Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · 2024Article
- Using machine learning to improve the diagnostic accuracy of the modified Duke/ESC 2015 criteria in patients with suspected prosthetic valve endocarditis - a proof of concept study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Prevalence of childhood hypertension and associated factors in Zhejiang Province: a cross-sectional analysis based on random forest model and logistic regression.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Explainable text-tabular models for predicting mortality risk in companion animals.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hematoma expansion prediction based on SMOTE and XGBoost algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Ensemble machine learning for predicting in-hospital mortality in Asian women with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Exploring Predictive Factors for Heart Failure Progression in Hypertensive Patients Based on Medical Diagnosis Data from the MIMIC-IV Database.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Determining risk and predictors of head and neck cancer treatment-related lymphedema: A clinicopathologic and dosimetric data mining approach using interpretable machine learning and ensemble feature selection.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Article
6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The outcomes of hypertension refer to the death or serious complications (such as myocardial infarction or stroke) that may occur in patients with hypertension. The outcomes of hypertension are very concerning for patients and doctors, and are ideally avoided. However, there is no satisfactory method for predicting the outcomes of hypertension. Therefore, this paper proposes a prediction method for outcomes based on physical examination indicators of hypertension patients. In this work, we divide the patients' outcome prediction into two steps. The first step is to extract the key features from the patients' many physical examination indicators. The second step is to use the key features extracted from the first step to predict the patients' outcomes. To this end, we propose a model combining recursive feature elimination with a cross-validation method and classification algorithm. In the first step, we use the recursive feature elimination algorithm to rank the importance of all features, and then extract the optimal features subset using cross-validation. In the second step, we use four classification algorithms (support vector machine (SVM), C4.5 decision tree, random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)) to accurately predict patient outcomes by using their optimal features subset. The selected model prediction performance evaluation metrics are accuracy, F1 measure, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve. The 10-fold cross-validation shows that C4.5, RF, and XGBoost can achieve very good prediction results with a small number of features, and the classifier after recursive feature elimination with cross-validation feature selection has better prediction performance. Among the four classifiers, XGBoost has the best prediction performance, and its accuracy, F1, and area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values are 94.36%, 0.875, and 0.927, respectively, using the optimal features subset. This article's prediction of hypertension outcomes contributes to the in-depth study of hypertension complications and has strong practical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.