Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703351›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Comparatively Barcoded Chromosomes of

Joanna Lusinska, Alexander Betekhtin, Diana Lopez-Alvarez, Pilar Catalan, Glyn Jenkins, Elzbieta Wolny, Robert Hasterok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Plant Genomics-Advancing Our Understanding of Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. Cytomolecular Organisation of the Nuclear Genome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  8. The Chromosome Number and rDNA Loci Evolution inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular and Cytogenetic Analysis of rDNA Evolution in Crepis Sensu Lato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joanna LusinskaInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4952-7423
Alexander BetekhtinInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6146-1669
Diana Lopez-AlvarezFaculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Columbia, Palmira 763533, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-7734-8481
Pilar CatalanDepartment of Agriculture (Botany), High Polytechnic School of Huesca, University of Zaragoza, 22071 Huesca, Spain.
Glyn JenkinsInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth SY23 3DA, UK.
Elzbieta WolnyInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland.
Robert HasterokInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 40-032 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6667-2721

Funding

National Science Centre Poland DEC-2012/04/A/NZ3/00572 and DEC-2014/14/M/NZ2/00519
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEvolution, MolecularKaryotypePolyploidyBrachypodiumChromosomes, PlantBrachypodiumcomparative chromosome barcodingdysploidykaryotype structure and evolutionmodel grass genusmolecular cytogeneticspolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID31703351
PMCPMC6888173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.