ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2019
Radiation dose efficiency of multi-energy photon-counting-detector CT for dual-contrast imaging.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based Differential Diagnosis of Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis by CT Image.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Trial
- An in silico evaluation of signal and separability properties of k-edge materials in spectral CT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Technical performance of dual-contrast-agent K-edge imaging with four energy thresholds on a commercial photon counting detector CT.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Improving decomposition image quality in dual-energy chest radiography using two-dimensional crisscrossed anti-scatter grid.Medical physics · 2025Article
- CT material decomposition with contrast agents: Single or multiple spectral photon-counting CT scans? A simulation study.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Review
- Photon-counting in dual-contrast-enhanced computed tomography: a proof-of-concept quantitative biomechanical assessment of articular cartilage.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Detection of myeloma-associated osteolytic bone lesions with energy-integrating and photon-counting detector CT.Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Efficacy of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Assessment of Depth of Invasion in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of 125 Clinical Cases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical applications of photon counting detector CT.European radiology · 2023Review
- [New contrast agents for photon-counting computed tomography].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- An introduction to photon-counting detector CT (PCD CT) for radiologists.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Improved coronary calcium detection and quantification with low-dose full field-of-view photon-counting CT: a phantom study.European radiology · 2022Article
- Simultaneous dual-contrast imaging using energy-integrating detector multi-energy CT: An in vivo feasibility study.Medical physics · 2022Article
- Dual-Contrast Biphasic Liver Imaging With Iodine and Gadolinium Using Photon-Counting Detector Computed Tomography: An Exploratory Animal Study.Investigative radiology · 2022Article
- Comparison of Low Dose Performance of Photon-Counting and Energy Integrating CT.Academic radiology · 2021Article
- Improved coronary calcification quantification using photon-counting-detector CT: an ex vivo study in cadaveric specimens.European radiology · 2021Article
- Energy-integrating-detector multi-energy CT: Implementation and a phantom study.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Photon Counting CT: Clinical Applications and Future Developments.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2021Article
- Spectral Photon Counting CT: Imaging Algorithms and Performance Assessment.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Compared to traditional multi-scan single-energy CT (SECT), one potential advantage of single-scan multi-energy CT (MECT) proposed for simultaneous imaging of multiple contrast agents is the radiation dose reduction. This phantom study aims to rigorously evaluate whether the radiation dose can truly be reduced in a single-scan MECT protocol (MECT_1s) in biphasic liver imaging with iodine and gadolinium, and small bowel imaging with iodine and bismuth, compared to traditional two-scan SECT protocols (SECT_2s). For MECT_1s, mixed iodine/gadolinium samples were prepared corresponding to late arterial/portal-venous phase for biphasic liver imaging. Mixed iodine/bismuth samples were prepared representing the arterial/enteric enhancement for small bowel imaging. For SECT_2s, separate contrast samples were prepared to mimic separate scans in arterial/venous phase and arterial/enteric enhancement. Samples were placed in a 35 cm wide water phantom and scanned by a research whole-body photon-counting-detector-CT (PCD-CT) system ('chess' mode). MECT images were acquired with optimized kV/threshold settings for each imaging task, and SECT images were acquired at 120 kV. Total CTDIvol was matched for the two protocols. Image-based three-material decomposition was employed in MECT_1s to determine the basis material concentration values, which were converted to CT numbers at 120 kV (i.e. virtual SECT images) to compare with the SECT images directly acquired with SECT_2s. The noise difference between the SECT and the virtual SECT images was compared to evaluate the dose efficiency of MECT_1s. Compared to SECT_2s, MECT_1s was not dose efficient for both imaging tasks. The amount of noise increase is highly task dependent, with noise increased by 203%/278% and 110%/82% in virtual SECT images for iodine/gadolinium and iodine/bismuth quantifications, respectively, corresponding to dose increase by 819%/1328% and 340%/230% in MECT_1s to achieve the same image noise level. MECT with the current PCD-CT technique requires higher radiation dose than SECT to achieve the same image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.