Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31703071›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Honey bee microbiome associated with different hive and sample types over a honey production season.

Sladjana Subotic, Andrew M Boddicker, Vy M Nguyen, James Rivers, Christy E Briles, Annika C Mosier

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beehives possess their own distinct microbiomes.Environmental microbiome · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Microbial communities associated with honey bees in Brazil and in the United States.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Characterization ofCells · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sladjana SuboticDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Andrew M BoddickerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7957-8283
Vy M NguyenDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
James RiversDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.
Christy E BrilesDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2596-6349
Annika C MosierDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5333-4854
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Western honey bees (Apis mellifera) are important pollinators in natural and agricultural ecosystems, and yet are in significant decline due to several factors including parasites, pathogens, pesticides, and habitat loss. A new beehive construction called the FlowTM hive was developed in 2015 to allow honey to be harvested directly from the hive without opening it, resulting in an apparent decrease in stress to the bees. Here, we compared the Flow and traditional Langstroth hive constructions to determine if there were any significant differences in the bee microbiome. The bee-associated bacterial communities did not differ between hive constructions and varied only slightly over the course of a honey production season. Samples were dominated by taxa belonging to the Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Bartonella, Snodgrassella, Gilliamella, and Frischella genera, as observed in previous studies. The top ten most abundant taxa made up the majority of the sequence data; however, many low abundance organisms were persistent across the majority of samples regardless of sampling time or hive type. We additionally compared different preparations of whole bee and dissected bee samples to elaborate on previous bee microbiome research. We found that bacterial sequences were overwhelming derived from the bee guts, and microbes on the bee surfaces (including pollen) contributed little to the overall microbiome of whole bees. Overall, the results indicate that different hive constructions and associated disturbance levels do not influence the bee gut microbiome, which has broader implications for supporting hive health.

Indexed as

HoneyMicrobiotaSeasonsAnimalsBacteriaBeesPollination

Identifiers

PMID31703071
PMCPMC6839897
OpenAlexW2985446310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.